1994
DOI: 10.1109/91.273129
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fuzzy rule-based networks for control

Abstract: We present a method for learning fuzzy logic membership functions and rules to approximate a numerical function from a set of examples of the function's independent variables and the resulting function value. This method uses a three-step approach to building a complete function approximation system: first, learning the membership functions and creating a cell-based rule representation; second, simplifying the cell-based rules using an information-theoretic approach for induction of rules from discrete-valued … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
31
0

Year Published

1996
1996
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 51 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
31
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Two identification methods are considered in the table: W&M and the method based on subtractive clustering (SC) proposed by Chiu [11]. The W&M method was found to consistently provide better results than other grid partition based methods, such as the algorithm by Higgins and Goodman [18]. The SC method was found to consistently provide better accuracy than other clustering based identification alternatives using the Gath-Geva [1,15], Gustafson-Kessel [17], hard and fuzzy C-means [13] clustering methods.…”
Section: B Comparison Of Different Neuro-fuzzy Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Two identification methods are considered in the table: W&M and the method based on subtractive clustering (SC) proposed by Chiu [11]. The W&M method was found to consistently provide better results than other grid partition based methods, such as the algorithm by Higgins and Goodman [18]. The SC method was found to consistently provide better accuracy than other clustering based identification alternatives using the Gath-Geva [1,15], Gustafson-Kessel [17], hard and fuzzy C-means [13] clustering methods.…”
Section: B Comparison Of Different Neuro-fuzzy Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Note that in some cases (as for example in the algorithm by Higgins and Goodman [18]), these two substages can be integrated into a standalone algorithm. The tuning process is driven by one or more error metrics.…”
Section: Substage 22: System Tuningmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Note that in some cases (as in the H&G [9] algorithm), these two substages can be integrated into a standalone algorithm. The tuning process is driven by one or more error metrics.…”
Section: ) Stage 22: System Tuningmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As the main goal is to minimize the overall error, the increase in the number of membership functions and rules will be accomplished by an overall analysis of the error in the whole function domain instead of examining only the point where the greatest error occurs as in [34]- [36]. To perform this overall analysis, we consider the final distribution of the SCMF index associated with each of the membership functions of each of the input variables.…”
Section: Determination Of a More Suitable Topology For The Fuzzy Smentioning
confidence: 99%