2003
DOI: 10.1109/tfuzz.2003.819842
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

"Fuzzy" versus "nonfuzzy" in combining classifiers designed by boosting

Abstract: Abstract-Boosting is recognized as one of the most successful techniques for generating classifier ensembles. Typically, the classifier outputs are combined by the weighted majority vote. The purpose of this study is to demonstrate the advantages of some fuzzy combination methods for ensembles of classifiers designed by Boosting. We ran two-fold cross-validation experiments on six benchmark data sets to compare the fuzzy and nonfuzzy combination methods. On the "fuzzy side" we used the fuzzy integral and the d… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
65
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 132 publications
(66 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
1
65
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Actually, it was shown in [Mar00] that the ordered weighted average, the WAM, and the partial minimum and maximum operators are all particular cases of FI with special FM. In fact, FI can be seen as a compromise between the evidence expressed by the outputs of the classification systems and the competence represented by the FM's knowledge of how the different information sources interact [Kun03].…”
Section: Fuzzy Integral and Fuzzy Measurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Actually, it was shown in [Mar00] that the ordered weighted average, the WAM, and the partial minimum and maximum operators are all particular cases of FI with special FM. In fact, FI can be seen as a compromise between the evidence expressed by the outputs of the classification systems and the competence represented by the FM's knowledge of how the different information sources interact [Kun03].…”
Section: Fuzzy Integral and Fuzzy Measurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In fact, FI can be seen as a compromise between the evidence expressed by the outputs of the classification systems and the competence represented by the FM's knowledge of how the different information sources interact [4].…”
Section: Fuzzy Integral and Fuzzy Measurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The better the FM describes the real competence and interaction among all classification systems, the more accurate results can be expected. There are two methods of calculating the FM known to the authors (if it is not provided by an expert knowledge): one based on fuzzy densities [4], and the other based on learning the FM from training data [7] [8]. In our work, we have used the latter method: a supervised, gradient-based algorithm of learning the FM, with additional steps for smoothing the unmodified nodes:…”
Section: Fuzzy Integral and Fuzzy Measurementioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations