2000
DOI: 10.1061/(asce)0733-947x(2000)126:6(464)
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fuzzy-Wavelet RBFNN Model for Freeway Incident Detection

Abstract: Traffic incidents are nonrecurrent and pseudorandom events that disrupt the normal flow of traffic and create a bottleneck in the road network. The probability of incidents is higher during peak flow rates when the systemwide effect of incidents is most severe. Model-based solutions to the incident detection problem have not produced practical, useful results primarily because the complexity of the problem does not lend itself to accurate mathematical and knowledge-based representations. A new multiparadigm in… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
110
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 200 publications
(110 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
110
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This algorithm was compared with the California Algorithm #8 and was found to produce very low false alarms (on the order of 0.07%), as compared to the California algorithm (on the order of 3.82%) under the same detection rate scenarios when tested with simulated data. Limited tests with real data gave 0% false alarms at 95% detection ratio for this algorithm, whereas the California algorithm produced 0.63% false alarms at a 90% detection ratio (Adeli & Karim, 2000;Karim & Adeli, 2002a).…”
Section: Probabilistic Neural Network Algorithmmentioning
confidence: 84%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…This algorithm was compared with the California Algorithm #8 and was found to produce very low false alarms (on the order of 0.07%), as compared to the California algorithm (on the order of 3.82%) under the same detection rate scenarios when tested with simulated data. Limited tests with real data gave 0% false alarms at 95% detection ratio for this algorithm, whereas the California algorithm produced 0.63% false alarms at a 90% detection ratio (Adeli & Karim, 2000;Karim & Adeli, 2002a).…”
Section: Probabilistic Neural Network Algorithmmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…The use of DWTs (Roy & Abdulhai, 2003) has also been explored for training the PNN, with encouraging results. Adeli and Karim (2000) proposed an algorithm using a Discrete Wavelet Transform (DWT) for noise reduction and feature extraction, followed by a fuzzy c-mean clustering to reduce the dimensionality of the input vector, finally using a Radial Basis Function Neural Network (RBFNN) to classify the input pattern as an incident pattern or a non-incident pattern. Sixteen consecutive data-points for occupancy and speed from the immediate past are used to form the input signal.…”
Section: Probabilistic Neural Network Algorithmmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The relatively new FWRBFNN based freeway incident detection algorithm was developed by Adeli & Karim (2000). The algorithm uses Radial Basis Function Neural Network (RBFNN) architecture in conjunction with wavelet-based denoising and fuzzy-logic based classification techniques.…”
Section: Fuzzy-wavelet Radial Basis Function Neural Networkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[To maintain comparability with other three algorithms, in this paper, the FWRBFNN algorithm uses upstream volume and occupancy as input instead of the upstream occupancy and speed as used by Adeli and Karim (2000). ]…”
Section: Fuzzy-wavelet Radial Basis Function Neural Networkmentioning
confidence: 99%