1994
DOI: 10.1016/0045-7949(94)90076-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fuzzy weighting optimization with several objective functions in structural design

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0
1

Year Published

1998
1998
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
4
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Shih and Lai [112] present a comparative study of two different methods based on the combination of weights applied to the optimization of fuzzy structural systems.…”
Section: Classic Optimizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Shih and Lai [112] present a comparative study of two different methods based on the combination of weights applied to the optimization of fuzzy structural systems.…”
Section: Classic Optimizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Dessa forma, além da otimização simultânea, pode ser necessário que as múltiplas características sejam tratadas com diferentes graus de importância, com o intuito de que a solução ótima apresente o melhor resultado global possível. Nesse contexto, verifica-se que a literatura ainda apresenta poucos estudos abordando um método sistemático para alocação de pesos (LEE; KIM, 2012;MISHRA, 2007;YANG, 2001;SHIH;LAI, 1994). Apesar de a maioria das estratégias de otimização permitir que diferentes pesos sejam atribuídos entre os múltiplos objetivos, observa-se que o critério adotado, na maioria dos casos, tem levado em consideração a experiência e o julgamento do tomador de decisão.…”
Section: Referênciasunclassified
“…Chen and Wang (1989) proposed a general fuzzy programming with wide generality in order to consider the overall fuzzy factors and fuzzy information in optimum design of engineering structures. Shih & Lai (1994) Kiyota et.al. (2001Kiyota et.al.…”
Section: Fuzzy Design Optimization Applicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…SPACE (3D) 2 bar: (Xiong, 2002;Rao & Xiong, 2005a;Rao & Xiong, 2005b) 3 bar: (Rao, 1987b;Chen & Wang, 1989;Rao et.al., 1992;Yu & Xu, 1994;Shih & Lai, 1994;Forouraghi et.al., 1994;Shih & Chang, 1995;Shih & Wangsawidjaja, 1995;Shih & Wangsawidjaja, 1996;Shih et.al., 1997;Yoo, 2000;Yoo & Hajela, 2001;Wang et.al., 2005) 4 bar: (Kiyota et.al., 2001;Kiyota et.al., 2003) (Cheng & Li, 1997;Kelesoglu & Ülker, 2005b) 9 bar: (Kelesoglu & Ulker, 2005a) 10 bar: (Shih, 1997) 11 bar: (Yoo & Hajela, 2001) 25 bar: (Rao, 1987b;Rao et.al., 1992;Xiong, 2002;Rao & Xiong, 2005a;Rao & Xiong, 2005b;Kelesoglu & Ülker, 2005b) 56 bar: (Kelesoglu, 2007) 72 bar: (Cheng & Li, 1997) 120 bar: (Kelesoglu & Ulker, 2005a) 244 bar: (Kelesoglu & Ulker, 2005a) 1310 bar: (Sarma & Adeli, 2000a;Sarma, 2001) …”
Section: Planar (2d)mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation