2004
DOI: 10.1016/j.jallcom.2004.05.040
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

FW/M method for determination of the grain size distribution from powder diffraction line profile

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
80
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 87 publications
(80 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
80
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Grain size distributions (see Fig. 2) in the final products were also determined on the basis of powder diffraction line profile using the Pielaszek method [17].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Grain size distributions (see Fig. 2) in the final products were also determined on the basis of powder diffraction line profile using the Pielaszek method [17].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Further, crystallite size distribution (SD) of this material has also been estimated by FW 1 5 = 4 5 M method [40]. A detailed description and justification of the FW1/5 and 4/5M method can be found elsewhere [41].…”
Section: Structural Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The main defect types or microstructural properties of which LPA can provide information are the (i) average crystallite size and (ii) size distribution, cf. [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20], (iii) average dislocation density and (iv) dislocation character, cf. [21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32] (v) slip activity, (vi) active Burgers vectors, cf.…”
Section: à2mentioning
confidence: 99%