During liver repair after injury, bile secretion has to be tightly modulated in order to preserve liver parenchyma from bile acid (BA)-induced injury. The mechanisms allowing the liver to maintain biliary homeostasis during repair after injury are not completely understood. Besides their historical role in lipid digestion, bile acids (BA) and their receptors constitute a signalling network with multiple impacts on liver repair, both stimulating regeneration and protecting the liver from BA overload. BA signal through nuclear (mainly Farnesoid X Receptor, FXR) and membrane (mainly G Protein-coupled BA Receptor 1, GPBAR-1 or TGR5) receptors to elicit a wide array of biological responses. While a great number of studies have been dedicated to the hepato-protective impact of FXR signalling, TGR5 is by far less explored in this context. Because the liver has to face massive and potentially harmful BA overload after partial ablation or destruction, BA-induced protective responses crucially contribute to spare liver repair capacities. Based on the available literature, the TGR5 BA receptor protects the remnant liver and maintains biliary homeostasis, mainly through the control of inflammation, biliary epithelial barrier permeability, BA pool hydrophobicity and sinusoidal blood flow. Mouse experimental models of liver injury reveal that in the lack of TGR5, excessive inflammation, leaky biliary epithelium and hydrophobic BA overload result in parenchymal insult and compromise optimal restoration of a functional liver mass. Translational perspectives are thus opened to target TGR5 with the aim of protecting the liver in the context of injury and BA overload.
K E Y W O R D Sbile acids, bile acid pool, hepatoprotection, liver injury, paracellular permeability, TGR5
| B ILE ACIDS AND THE ENTEROHEPATI C C YCLEBile acids, the end products of cholesterol catabolism, are produced in hepatocytes and secreted in the canalicular lumen, flow through the bile ducts towards the duodenum, travel in the intestine until they are massively reabsorbed in the ileum back to the liver along the so-called enterohepatic cycle (EHC). The small BA fraction escaping from ileal reabsorption and flowing through the colon is then transformed by the gut microbiota, resulting in the production of secondary BA which are more hydrophobic -thus more toxic -than primary BA (those produced in hepatocytes). Hydrophobic secondary BA cross passively the colon epithelium and join the other BA