Gabler Kompakt-Lexikon Umsatzsteuer 2004
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-322-86986-9_7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

G

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Many studies using chimeric or mutant receptors have shown that the extracellular domains contribute to the binding and ligand selectivity [29][30][31] and further, that the ECD1 constitutes a major peptide-binding domain. 30,[32][33][34][35][36] The juxtamembrane receptor domain, that is, the receptor excluding the ECD1, also binds peptide ligands, albeit with significantly lower affinity. 35 The data from the constitutively active tethered-ligand receptor show that the juxtamembrane domain is involved in transducing the signaling response.…”
Section: Crf Receptorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many studies using chimeric or mutant receptors have shown that the extracellular domains contribute to the binding and ligand selectivity [29][30][31] and further, that the ECD1 constitutes a major peptide-binding domain. 30,[32][33][34][35][36] The juxtamembrane receptor domain, that is, the receptor excluding the ECD1, also binds peptide ligands, albeit with significantly lower affinity. 35 The data from the constitutively active tethered-ligand receptor show that the juxtamembrane domain is involved in transducing the signaling response.…”
Section: Crf Receptorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are many PAC1 splice variants, including N-terminal deletions and intracellular loop insertions; these modify the peptide binding and signalling properties of the receptor (Spongier et al, 1993;Blechman and Levkowitz, 2013). The most commonly studied variant, PAC1n, as defined by Dautzenberg et al, 1999, contains the full N-terminal domain and lacks insertions into the intracellular loops (Spongier et al, 1993;Pisegna and Wank, 1996;Dautzenberg et al, 1999;Furness et al, 2012).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Both PACAP isoforms belong to the vasoactive intestinal polypeptide (VIP) family. Two PACAP receptors with similar affinity for VIP and PACAP are VPAC1 and VPAC2, whereas the PAC1 receptor prefers PACAP exclusively (Dautzenberg et al, 1999). By alternative splicing of the PAC1 gene, six receptor isoforms are generated with or without the inclusion of three 28-amino-acid sequences/cassettes (HIP, HOP-1 and/ or HOP-2) in the third intracellular loop; the short form includes no cassettes (Spengler et al, 1993).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%