Articles you may be interested inAn electron spin resonance investigation of vanadium dioxide (51V16O2 and 51V17O2) and 51V17O in neon matrices with preliminary assignments for VO3 and V+ 2: Comparison with ab initio theoretical calculations Electron spin resonance matrix isolation and ab initio theoretical investigations of 69,71GaH2,69,71GaD2, H69,71GaCH3, and D69,71GaCD3 Conductive Cu(2,5dimethyldicyanoquinonediimine)2 radical ion salts: Systems with none, one, or two phase transitions Interaction of gasphase atomic deuterium with the Ru(001)-p(1×2)-O surface: Kinetics of hydroxyl and water formationThe spin relaxation of the muonium-substituted ethyl radical ͑MuCH 2 Ċ H 2 ͒ and its deuterated analog ͑MuCD 2 Ċ D 2 ͒ has been studied in the gas phase in both transverse and longitudinal magnetic fields spanning the range ϳ0.5-35 kG, over a pressure range from ϳ1-16 atm at ambient temperature. The Mu 13 CH 2 13 Ċ H 2 radical has also been investigated, at 2.7 atm. For comparison, some data is also reported for the MuCH 2 Ċ ͑CH 3 ͒ 2 ͑Mu-t-butyl͒ radical at a pressure of 2.6 atm. This experiment establishes the importance of the SR technique in studying spin relaxation phenomena of polyatomic radicals in the gas phase, where equivalent ESR data is sparse or nonexistent. Both T 1 ͑longitudinal͒ and T 2 ͑transverse͒ SR relaxation rates are reported and interpreted with a phenomenological model. Relaxation results from fluctuating terms in the spin Hamiltonian, inducing transitions between the eigenstates assumed from an isotropic hyperfine interaction. Low-field relaxation is primarily due to the electron, via both the nuclear hyperfine ͑S-A-I͒ and the spin rotation interactions ͑S-J͒, communicated to the muon via the isotropic muon-electron hyperfine interaction. At the highest fields, direct spin flips of the muon become important, due to fluctuations in the anisotropic part of the muon-electron hyperfine interaction. In the intermediate field region a muon-electron ''flip-flop'' relaxation mechanism dominates, due partly to the anisotropic hyperfine interaction and partly to modulation of the isotropic muon-electron hyperfine coupling. In the case of the T 2 rates, electron relaxation mechanisms dominate over a much wider field range than for the T 1 rates, and inhomogeneous line broadening also contributes. The fluctuations that induce both the T 1 and T 2 relaxation rates are described by a single correlation time, c , inversely proportional to the pressure. An effective spin-reorientation cross section is deduced from this pressure dependence, J ϳ100Ϯ20 Å 2 , for all isotopically substituted ethyl radicals. This is similar to the geometrical cross section, but about a factor of 4 larger than values of J found for similar-sized diamagnetic molecules by gas phase NMR, primarily reflecting the longer range of the electron-induced intermolecular potential.