1969
DOI: 10.1016/0375-9474(69)90109-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

g-Factor of the 810.5 keV level in 58Fe

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

1971
1971
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In an NMR experiment, however, where a jump rate is obtained, it can happen that long-range diffusion is not involved, and that the characteristic time observed is merely some local motion. Thus in the perturbed angular correlation studies of Indium at (probably) Cu(1) sites in YBCO, in which the very low activation energy ((14+4) meV) is attributed to oxygen motion (Singh et al 1989b), one assumes this is a local activated process, as the energy is far smaller than from other experiments.…”
Section: Types Of Diffusion Constantmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…In an NMR experiment, however, where a jump rate is obtained, it can happen that long-range diffusion is not involved, and that the characteristic time observed is merely some local motion. Thus in the perturbed angular correlation studies of Indium at (probably) Cu(1) sites in YBCO, in which the very low activation energy ((14+4) meV) is attributed to oxygen motion (Singh et al 1989b), one assumes this is a local activated process, as the energy is far smaller than from other experiments.…”
Section: Types Of Diffusion Constantmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…These trends might be an indication of the weakening of the N = 40 shell gap a Present and previous transient-field studies normalized to the adopted average value for 56 Fe. b Integral perturbed angular correlation measurement from [6]. c Normalization value adopted from [8].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For 58 Fe, aside from the transient-field measurement of Brennan et al [5], there has also been a radioactivity measurement by the integral perturbed angular correlation (IPAC) technique [6]. When the result of that work [6] is corrected to account for more recent lifetime data [20] it becomes g(2 + 1 ) = 0.514(118).…”
Section: Relative and Absolute G Factorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations