2018
DOI: 10.18174/455159
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

G-TwYST harmonisation of statistical methods for use of omics data in food safety assessment

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

1
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 44 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…With regard to the difficulty to obtain sufficient reference data in any single study, the use of databases was proposed in several publications. , However, it should be evaluated if these databases are sufficiently representing the design of the experiments and allow for distinguishing genotypic from environmental variation. With regard to the multiplicity problem, it is currently being discussed whether univariate or multivariate methods are most suitable and whether the false discovery rate (FDR) is apt or inapt to control false non-discoveries. , It may be time to compare and evaluate the different proposals and improve the science-based methodology if appropriate and where possible, ensuring an open and constructive discussion involving all stakeholders.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With regard to the difficulty to obtain sufficient reference data in any single study, the use of databases was proposed in several publications. , However, it should be evaluated if these databases are sufficiently representing the design of the experiments and allow for distinguishing genotypic from environmental variation. With regard to the multiplicity problem, it is currently being discussed whether univariate or multivariate methods are most suitable and whether the false discovery rate (FDR) is apt or inapt to control false non-discoveries. , It may be time to compare and evaluate the different proposals and improve the science-based methodology if appropriate and where possible, ensuring an open and constructive discussion involving all stakeholders.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%