2009
DOI: 10.3892/ijo_00000439
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

G2-checkpoint abrogation in irradiated lymphocytes: A new cytogenetic approach to assess individual radiosensitivity and predisposition to cancer

Abstract: Abstract. Increased yield of chromatid breaks, following in vitro G2-phase lymphocyte irradiation, can be a marker of individual radiosensitivity and cancer predisposing genes whose role is to respond to DNA damage. Mutations or polymorphisms of genes encoding DNA repair pathways may underlie the increased chromosomal radiosensitivity. However, genes that facilitate DNA damage recognition, using signal transduction pathways to activate cell cycle arrest and preserve genomic integrity, are perhaps the most impo… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
11
0
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
0
11
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…11 Likewise, Terzoudi et al introduced a new approach to G2/M cell cycle checkpoint abrogation for assessing IRS using caffeine treatment; this method demonstrated better discrimination and minimal intra-individual and inter-laboratory variations compared to the conventional G2-assay. 19,20 Claes et al reported the use of a modified S-G2 micronucleus assay in which caffeine treatment formed a complementary assay for the identification of atypical A-T patients and heterozygous ATM carriers. 29 Prodosmo et al proposed a new, fast and cost-effective test to determine ATM zygosity based on p53 centrosomal localisation visualised by immunofluorescence staining.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…11 Likewise, Terzoudi et al introduced a new approach to G2/M cell cycle checkpoint abrogation for assessing IRS using caffeine treatment; this method demonstrated better discrimination and minimal intra-individual and inter-laboratory variations compared to the conventional G2-assay. 19,20 Claes et al reported the use of a modified S-G2 micronucleus assay in which caffeine treatment formed a complementary assay for the identification of atypical A-T patients and heterozygous ATM carriers. 29 Prodosmo et al proposed a new, fast and cost-effective test to determine ATM zygosity based on p53 centrosomal localisation visualised by immunofluorescence staining.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…20,22 On the other hand, some of the obligate heterozygotes may have had a range of ATM mutations; consequently, these individuals may, like A-T patients, have exhibited various degrees of radiosensitivity both in vitro and clinically. [7][8][9][10][11]19,25,28,29 Furthermore, technical issues in different laboratories can intensify such variations. 22 Finally, the assay was not specific for ATM mutations and may therefore have identified mutations in other genes which modify DNA repair system efficiency.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…With few exceptions, chromatid aberration yields were obtained by scoring for chromatid breaks and gaps 50 metaphases per culture, under a Zeiss AxioImager Z2 microscope coupled with MSearch-AutoCapt software (Metasystems, Altlussheim Germany). Following calculation of the in vitro individual radiosensitivity index (IRS = [1-(G 2caf -G 2 )/G 2caf ] × 100%, simplified as IRS = (G 2 /G 2caf ) × 100%) patients were classified as: highly radiosensitive, HRS (IRS > 70), radiosensitive, RS (50 < IRS ≤ 70), normal, N (30 ≤ IRS ≤ 50), and radioresistant, RR (IRS < 30) (15, 29).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Enhanced CA after irradiation has been detected in ~40% of BC patients while only in ~10% of healthy individuals [9,10]. G2 assay, a widely used method for the study of radiosensitivity, is in vitro irradiation of peripheral blood lymphocytes in G2 phase of cell cycle to create DNA damage, which is often repaired during G2 to M-phase transition, residual lesions can be observed and measured at metaphase as CA [11]. The high frequencies of chromosomal aberrations expressed following G2 exposure significantly differentiate between radiosensitive and nonradiosensitive cells or individuals [12][13][14][15][16].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%