2014
DOI: 10.1136/archdischild-2014-306237.294
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

G311(P) Improving paediatric oncology supportive care in a resource-limited setting: focus on neutropaenic sepsis

Abstract: Background Our institution is the only tertiary paediatric oncology centre serving a low-income country with a population of over 35 million. Outcomes are limited by social factors, material resources and shortages of qualified health care workers. Many children do not benefit from available chemotherapy drugs due to high mortality from treatment-related toxicity. Objectives To improve in-patient supportive care Methods At the beginning of the intervention (July 2011) discussion among medical, nursing, and… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Such assessments are subjective and difficult to measure in distressed children, and data are often missing compared to the other physiological parameters which are recorded with devices [9]. During the last 10 years, the nursing work load, particularly the administrative aspects, has increased greatly and since current methods for measuring respiratory rate are time consuming, this may be one reason why the frequency of measurement of respiratory rate has not improved [10, 11].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such assessments are subjective and difficult to measure in distressed children, and data are often missing compared to the other physiological parameters which are recorded with devices [9]. During the last 10 years, the nursing work load, particularly the administrative aspects, has increased greatly and since current methods for measuring respiratory rate are time consuming, this may be one reason why the frequency of measurement of respiratory rate has not improved [10, 11].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%