Proceedings of the International Conference on Control Applications
DOI: 10.1109/cca.2002.1040231
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

GA-based neuro-fuzzy controller for flexible-link manipulator

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Optimization of the rule-base corresponds to partially learning it. 15,16 It is evident from di®erent implementation of FLCs that learning or optimizing the MFs is computationally less complex than the adaptation of the rule-base. 17 MFs can easily be described by parameters, which can then be optimized with respect to a global error measure.…”
Section: And A2 In Appendix Amentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Optimization of the rule-base corresponds to partially learning it. 15,16 It is evident from di®erent implementation of FLCs that learning or optimizing the MFs is computationally less complex than the adaptation of the rule-base. 17 MFs can easily be described by parameters, which can then be optimized with respect to a global error measure.…”
Section: And A2 In Appendix Amentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Oke and Istefanopulos [11] applied fuzzy logic control with gravity compensation for the point-to-point control of a two link flexible manipulator, and utilized a gradient descent method off-line for the trajectory planning. Siddique and Tokhi [12] used the direct inverse neural control using genetic learning to control a single-link flexible manipulator.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Over the last two decades, the control of FJMs has also benefited from strategies that seek to reduce the impact of modeling difficulties on controller performance, instead making use such nonmodel intensive strategies as genetic algorithms, particle swarm optimization methods, fuzzy logic, neural networks [11][12][13][14][15][16][17], and more recently, the so-called iPI and iPID strategies [18][19][20]. These pseudomodel based control strategies have enabled a compromise between the cost of real-time controller implementation and the need for highly accurate models in model-based control.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%