2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2015.10.087
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

GABA concentration in superior temporal sulcus predicts gamma power and perception in the sound-induced flash illusion

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

4
60
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 85 publications
(65 citation statements)
references
References 60 publications
4
60
1
Order By: Relevance
“…␥ power has been involved in cross-modal interactions and ownership illusions (Kanayama et al, 2007(Kanayama et al, , 2009, and the "temporal correlation hypothesis" (Singer and Gray, 1995) proposed that oscillatory brain activity may be a key mechanism not only for unisensory processing (e.g., featural binding, attention guiding), but also for cross-modal processing (Engel et al, 2012). Increased ␥ power was found in multisensory illusions, such as the sound-induced flash illusion (Bhattacharya et al, 2002;Mishra et al, 2007;Balz et al, 2016), which is in line with the present data in suggesting that oscillatory activity in the ␥ band reflects perceptual changes resulting from cross-modal interactions. The finding that a different set of electrodes reflected changes in the magnitude of illusory self-touch (sensorimotor regions) versus the afterimage drift (frontotemporal regions) suggests that both phenomena rely on different spectral mechanisms in anatomically different systems (Fig.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…␥ power has been involved in cross-modal interactions and ownership illusions (Kanayama et al, 2007(Kanayama et al, , 2009, and the "temporal correlation hypothesis" (Singer and Gray, 1995) proposed that oscillatory brain activity may be a key mechanism not only for unisensory processing (e.g., featural binding, attention guiding), but also for cross-modal processing (Engel et al, 2012). Increased ␥ power was found in multisensory illusions, such as the sound-induced flash illusion (Bhattacharya et al, 2002;Mishra et al, 2007;Balz et al, 2016), which is in line with the present data in suggesting that oscillatory activity in the ␥ band reflects perceptual changes resulting from cross-modal interactions. The finding that a different set of electrodes reflected changes in the magnitude of illusory self-touch (sensorimotor regions) versus the afterimage drift (frontotemporal regions) suggests that both phenomena rely on different spectral mechanisms in anatomically different systems (Fig.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…There is now good evidence that vision is shaped by nonvisual bodily inputs (for review, see , including vestibular , proprioceptive (Salomon et al, 2013b), tactile (Lunghi et al, 2010;Faivre et al, 2016;, motor (Maruya et al, 2007;Salomon et al, 2013a), cardiac signals (Salomon et al, 2016a), and full-body stimuli, including body size (van der Hoort et al, 2011(van der Hoort et al, , 2014Banakou et al, 2013). By showing in five independent experiments that the position of an afterimage depends on the synchrony of tactileproprioceptive stimulation, we report that the Taylor illusion does not just depend on bodily inputs, but also on the sense of body ownership.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In line with the role of inhibitory interneurons in generating gamma band activity, a positive correlation between GABA levels in superior temporal sulcus (measured using MRS) and the power of induced gamma band oscillations has been reported (Balz et al, 2016), suggesting that increased induced gamma band power is associated with higher GABA levels. This position is also supported by pharmalogical manipulations of GABA, as administration of propofol (a GABA agonist) leads to an increase in induced gamma band power (Saxena, Muthukumaraswamy, & Diukova, 2013).…”
Section: High Frequency Neural Oscillations (Gamma-band Activity)mentioning
confidence: 58%
“…Previous MRS studies reported correlations between behavioral or neurophysiological measures and GABA estimates within targeted brain regions (Bachtiar et al, 2015; Balz et al, 2016; Boy et al, 2010; Heba et al, 2016; Jocham et al, 2012; Stagg et al, 2011a; 2011b; Sumner et al, 2010; van Loon et al, 2013). For example, resting GABA content in primary motor cortex was positively correlated with individual differences in motor sequence reaction time (Stagg et al, 2011a).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%