2015
DOI: 10.1038/npp.2015.222
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

GABA-Mediated Inactivation of Medial Prefrontal and Agranular Insular Cortex in the Rat: Contrasting Effects on Hunger- and Palatability-Driven Feeding

Abstract: A microanalysis of hunger-driven and palatability-driven feeding was carried out after muscimol-mediated inactivation of two frontal regions in rats, the agranular/dysgranular insular cortex (AIC) and the ventromedial prefrontal cortex (vmPFC). Food and water intake, feeding microstructure, and general motor activity were measured under two motivational conditions: food-deprived rats given standard chow or ad libitum-fed rats given a palatable chocolate shake. Muscimol infusions into the AIC diminished intake,… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

6
40
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(46 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
6
40
0
Order By: Relevance
“…μ-OR stimulation in the ventromedial prefrontal cortex (vmPFC), mainly the infralimbic region, engenders feeding both in food-deprived and ad libitum -maintained rats (Mena et al 2011); the organization of this feeding response consists of brief feeding bouts, and abrupt switching between food-directed responses and responses directed away from food (e.g., ‘exploratory-like’ ambulatory or rearing behaviors). This pattern is essentially the opposite of that engendered by GABA-mediated inactivation of the vmPFC (i.e., longer feeding bouts and less ambulation and rearing) (Baldo et al 2016; Mena et al 2011), suggesting that the net behaviorally relevant effect of μ-OR stimulation is to activate or disinhibit cortical output. Presently, the role of μ-ORs in regulating pyramidal neuron activity (and thus cortical output) is not well understood.…”
Section: Feeding-modulatory Opioid Actions In the Pfcmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…μ-OR stimulation in the ventromedial prefrontal cortex (vmPFC), mainly the infralimbic region, engenders feeding both in food-deprived and ad libitum -maintained rats (Mena et al 2011); the organization of this feeding response consists of brief feeding bouts, and abrupt switching between food-directed responses and responses directed away from food (e.g., ‘exploratory-like’ ambulatory or rearing behaviors). This pattern is essentially the opposite of that engendered by GABA-mediated inactivation of the vmPFC (i.e., longer feeding bouts and less ambulation and rearing) (Baldo et al 2016; Mena et al 2011), suggesting that the net behaviorally relevant effect of μ-OR stimulation is to activate or disinhibit cortical output. Presently, the role of μ-ORs in regulating pyramidal neuron activity (and thus cortical output) is not well understood.…”
Section: Feeding-modulatory Opioid Actions In the Pfcmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…If so, then enhanced neurotransmission, either in the amount of neurotransmitter released or receptor signaling, could underlie the more extensive activation of NA neurons in BEP than in BER rats. Within the mPFC, complex interactions between GABAergic interneurons and glutamatergic projection neurons mediate executive control of goal-directed behaviors, including the amount and microstructure of chow and PF consumption [8,2832]. In mice, PF induces differential Fos expression in inhibitory and excitatory mPFC neurons; the vast majority of excitatory projection neurons are activated by PF, whereas only a small subset of inhibitory interneurons is activated by PF [8].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…), nor did it affect food intake after refeeding ( Fig 1C; Post-fast Feeding, n.s.). Inhibition of the projection neurons in the insular cortex also had no effect on anxiety behavior in an elevated plus maze task or 15 general locomotor activity ( Figure 1D-E, n.s.). These results indicate that glutamatergic projection neurons in the insular cortex mediate conditioned overconsumption, but do not regulate homeostatic feeding (14,15).…”
mentioning
confidence: 93%
“…We found that returning these mice to this same environment at a later time led to increased food consumption relative to controls even when the mice were fed. The data indicated that the mice had associated the cues in this environment with a prior experience of hunger (and food availability) leading the mice to 15 continue to eat even when they were satiated. Thus mice previously given food in a novel context when hungry (Ctx+) ate more food when returned to this environment than control mice (Ctx-) even when they were satiated ( Fig.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation