2016
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0153037
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Gabapentin for the Management of Chronic Pelvic Pain in Women (GaPP1): A Pilot Randomised Controlled Trial

Abstract: Chronic pelvic pain (CPP) affects 2.1–24% of women. Frequently, no underlying pathology is identified, and the pain is difficult to manage. Gabapentin is prescribed for CPP despite no robust evidence of efficacy. We performed a pilot trial in two UK centres to inform the planning of a future multicentre RCT to evaluate gabapentin in CPP management. Our primary objective was to determine levels of participant recruitment and retention. Secondary objectives included estimating potential effectiveness, acceptabil… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
70
0
2

Year Published

2016
2016
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 52 publications
(73 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
1
70
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…We found one randomised controlled trial comparing gabapentin and amitriptyline for chronic pelvic pain in women with a range of pelvic pathologies, 12 and our own recently published pilot trial (GaPP1) comparing gabapentin with placebo in women with chronic pelvic pain and no identifiable pelvic pathology. 13 In both studies, gabapentin was shown to improve pain scores compared with the control arm; however, neither study has sufficient power to guide practice.…”
Section: What Is the Evidence Of Uncertainty?mentioning
confidence: 98%
“…We found one randomised controlled trial comparing gabapentin and amitriptyline for chronic pelvic pain in women with a range of pelvic pathologies, 12 and our own recently published pilot trial (GaPP1) comparing gabapentin with placebo in women with chronic pelvic pain and no identifiable pelvic pathology. 13 In both studies, gabapentin was shown to improve pain scores compared with the control arm; however, neither study has sufficient power to guide practice.…”
Section: What Is the Evidence Of Uncertainty?mentioning
confidence: 98%
“…52,53 Data also support the use of gabapentin in patients with CPP, and has been shown to decrease pain levels in patients with pain refractory to nonopioid pain medications. 47,54 A small randomized pilot study evaluated efficacy of gabapentin compared to placebo for treatment of CPP of unknown etiology. Patients taking gabapentin reported decreased pain and improved mood, sustained at 6 months of follow-up.…”
Section: Membrane Stabilizersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Patients taking gabapentin reported decreased pain and improved mood, sustained at 6 months of follow-up. 54 In a study comparing amitriptyline to gabapentin, patients taking gabapentin (alone or combined with amitriptyline) had superior pain reduction with lower VAS scores. 47,55 Side effects were lowest in the gabapentin-only group.…”
Section: Membrane Stabilizersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Gabapentin dose was titrated until the patient met a 50% reduction in reported pain (maximum dose 2700 mg/day). In one measure of pain, there was improvement of pain in the treatment group [45]. No current published studies pertaining to the use of pregabalin and CPP in women exist; however, a large randomized controlled trial in men with chronic prostatitis/CPP syndrome (thought to be a neuropathic pain condition) did not show a significant improvement in pain symptoms after 6 weeks of use (up to 600 mg/day) when compared with placebo [46].…”
Section: Membrane Stabilizersmentioning
confidence: 99%