Gabor Analysis and Algorithms 1998
DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4612-2016-9_15
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Gabor’s signal expansion in optics

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In order to obtain the object function O(r) and the illumination function P(r) we identify the diffracted wavefield, Eqs. (2) and 4, as an expansion of the object signal onto a sort of "elementary" 2D signals [23,31,32,34]. Therefore, from windowed-Fourier transform theory, we can directly write the inversion formula for the object as [23,[30][31][32][35][36][37]:…”
Section: Reconstruction Formulasmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to obtain the object function O(r) and the illumination function P(r) we identify the diffracted wavefield, Eqs. (2) and 4, as an expansion of the object signal onto a sort of "elementary" 2D signals [23,31,32,34]. Therefore, from windowed-Fourier transform theory, we can directly write the inversion formula for the object as [23,[30][31][32][35][36][37]:…”
Section: Reconstruction Formulasmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several applications of Gabor expansions in optics have been described by BASTIAANS (1998). Although, this approach provides a self-consistent selection criterion for the summation of Gaussian beams, it was observed by DAUBECHIES (1990) that the Gabor expansion coefficients of BASTIAANS (1980) at critical sampling are only marginally stable.…”
Section: Extensions Of the Gaussian Beam Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Clearly, such a fine-structure, highly distributed function drastically complicates the numerical integration in (20), which has to be performed many times to obtain the full set of amplitudes. This circumstance may even be a reason to reject the Gabor expansion in favour of a computationally more expensive 'frame-based' representation [16], which is also known as the oversampled Gabor expansion [10]. But for the purpose herein, since the decomposition into narrower beamlets implies the condition ρ 2 1;2 Im Q αβ (ŝ)u (1;2) α u (1;2) β < 1, one can reduce the infinite integration in (20) to the series of integrals over the h-function quasi-periods within which the relatively slow function f (ξ, η) is replaced with its truncated local Taylor expansion.…”
Section: Gb Propagation and Beamlet Decompositionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A more plain approach is to perform a proper discrete representation of the wavefield at once. That is what can be done with the Gabor expansion, which has been initially introduced in the context of signal processing [7] and subsequently obtained a practical footing [8] and various applications in optics [9][10][11][12][13]. The free parameters of the Gabor expansion allow to vary the beamlet width and thus may be chosen suitably small.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%