2010
DOI: 10.1080/00071773.2010.11006720
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Gadamer on Heidegger: Is the History of Being ‘Just’ Another Philosophy of History?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 11 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the research planning stage, potential researchers must reflect on their own philosophical beliefs regarding the practice of bracketing, or epoché . If they, like Hans-Georg Gadamer, and his influencer at Frieburg, Heidegger, feel that bracketing is impossible and in Gadamer’s opinion “absurd,” then descriptive phenomenology may not be the best option (Agrey, 2014; Laverty, 2003, p. 25; Marino, 2010). If the researchers’ epistemological stance is that bracketing is indeed plausible and preferable, then a descriptive approach is a feasible option.…”
Section: Applications Of Descriptive and Interpretive Phenomenologicamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the research planning stage, potential researchers must reflect on their own philosophical beliefs regarding the practice of bracketing, or epoché . If they, like Hans-Georg Gadamer, and his influencer at Frieburg, Heidegger, feel that bracketing is impossible and in Gadamer’s opinion “absurd,” then descriptive phenomenology may not be the best option (Agrey, 2014; Laverty, 2003, p. 25; Marino, 2010). If the researchers’ epistemological stance is that bracketing is indeed plausible and preferable, then a descriptive approach is a feasible option.…”
Section: Applications Of Descriptive and Interpretive Phenomenologicamentioning
confidence: 99%