Gadobutrol-Enhanced Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Detection of Coronary Artery Disease

Arai, Andrew E; Schulz‐Menger, Jeanette; Berman, Daniel S.; Mahrholdt, Heiko; Han, Yuchi; Bandettini, W. Patricia; Gutberlet, Matthias; Abraham, Arun; Woodard, Pamela K.; Selvanayagam, Joseph B.; McCann, Gerry P; Hamilton-Craig, C.; Schoepf, U. Joseph; Tan, Ru San; Kramer, Christopher M.; Friedrich, Matthias G.; Haverstock, Daniel; Liu, Zheyu; Brueggenwerth, Guenther; Bacher-Stier, Claudia; Santiuste, Marta; Pennell, Dudley J.; Investigators, GadaCAD

doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2020.07.060

Cited by 44 publications

(35 citation statements)

References 46 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Beides ist essenzieller Bestandteil einer kardiologischen Weiterbildung inklusive der Programmierung von Schrittmacher und ICD/CRT-Devices, die mittlerweile schon seit vielen Jahren auch unter den entsprechenden Bedingungen [13,14] keine absolute Kontraindikation mehr für eine CMR-Untersuchung darstellen. Die Gabe von gadoliniumhaltigen Kontrastmitteln wird derzeit in Studien [19] untersucht und zum Wohle des Patienten der Gebrauch auch deutlich reduziert, bzw. es werden neue Verfahren erprobt, evtl.…”

Section: Sichere Durchführung Der Kardiovaskulären Mrtunclassified

Kompetenz und Innovation in der kardiovaskulären MRT: Stellungnahme der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Kardiologie – Herz- und Kreislaufforschung

et al. 2021

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Competence and innovation in cardiovascular MRI: statement of the German Cardiac SocietyThis statement of the German Cardiac Society (DGK) focusses on required cardiological competence levels in cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging (CMR) and their impact on clinical management including diagnostics, procedural planning and treatment of patients in cardiology. There is plenty of both basic technical and clinical innovation based on research by German and European cardiologists with high clinical impact that have been included in national, European and international guidelines. This statement provides guidance on safe and competent performance of CMR examinations including the various applications. It also defines competence levels, which enable a high-quality execution of the examination and utilization of the derived information in the clinical arena.

show abstract

Section: Sichere Durchführung Der Kardiovaskulären Mrtunclassified

Kompetenz und Innovation in der kardiovaskulären MRT: Stellungnahme der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Kardiologie – Herz- und Kreislaufforschung

et al. 2021

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…The landmark CE-MARC study has established CMR's high diagnostic accuracy in CAD and CMR's superiority over SPECT8. Since then, several studies have reported the diagnostic accuracy of stress CMR, the most recent reporting a sensitivity of 78,9% and specifi city of 86.8%, with an area under the curve of 0.871, for detection of ≥70% coronary stenosis 3 .…”

Section: Clinical Indicationsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Stress-perfusion CMR has shown a high diagnostic accuracy in patients with suspected or known CAD, including when compared with the current gold standard, the invasive measurement of fractional fl ow reserve (FFR) [3][4][5][6][7][8][9] .…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Although this technique is being increasingly used in daily practice for ischemia detection, it is the least widely available among the other non-invasive investigations, even in high-income western countries [1][2][3][4][5] . A very recent European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging (EACVI) survey reported that stress perfusion CMR was available in only 46% of the interrogated centers in Europe 1 .…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Stress perfusion CMR – a report of an initial Romanian experience

Onciul¹,

Popa

Nicolaescu³

et al. 2021

Romanian Journal of Cardiology

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Objectives – To provide preliminary data on practice of stress perfusion cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) in a single center in Romania. Methods – We retrospectively reviewed the clinical files and CMR reports of patients who underwent stress perfusion CMR in our institution between January 2018 and December 2020. Results – A total of 1036 patients underwent CMR examinations during this period in our institution. Of these, 120 patients had stress perfusion CMR. The most common indication was the assessment of myocardial ischaemia in patients with established coronary artery disease (CAD) (77 patients, 64.16%), with either a history of myocardial infarction or previous coronary revascularization, or with intermediate lesions on invasive coronary angiography (ICA). The other indications consisted in detection of ischaemia in patients with suspected CAD (36 patients, 30%), characterization of the substrate of ventricular arrhythmia (5 patients, 4.16%) and assessment of the etiology of dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM) (4 patients, 3.33%). All patients had vasodilator stress with adenosine and an adequate stress response was obtained in 113 patients (94.16%). There were 21 patients (18.58%) with an abnormal stress test and patients with intermediate lesions on ICA had the highest prevalence of positive reports (24.32%). Sixty-three patients had myocardial fibrosis (52.5%): 49 patients (40.83%) had subendocardial (ischaemic) scars, while 14 patients (11.66%) had non-ischaemic scars. There were no serious adverse events related to the procedure. Conclusions – This is the first report in Romania on the use of stress perfusion CMR in clinical practice. We report our experience on stress efficiency, acquisition protocol, artifacts, prevalence of positive tests and safety. Most stress CMRs were requested in patients with established CAD.

show abstract

“…These changes then lead to myocardial infarction (MI) or sudden death. Cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) imaging has been used to diagnose MI for a long time [ 1 – 3 ]. Previous studies have demonstrated that the CMR markers of myocardial and microvascular damage add incremental prognostic information to clinical diagnoses [ 4 – 7 ]; however, most of these studies lack prognostic information in patients with CHD and BH impairments.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Prognosis in patients with coronary heart disease and breath-holding limitations: a free-breathing cardiac magnetic resonance protocol at 3.0 T

Wang

Zhang

et al. 2021

BMC Cardiovasc Disord

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background and purpose Conventional cardiac magnetic resonance (CCMR) imaging is usually performed with breath-holding (BH), which is adverse in patients with BH limitations. We explored the ability of a free-breathing CMR (fCMR) protocol to prognosticate in patients with coronary heart diseases (CHD) and limited BH ability. Methods Sixty-seven patients with CHD and limited BH abilities were prospectively enrolled in this study. All patients underwent comprehensive fCMR imaging at 3.0 T. The fCMR protocols included compressed sensing (CS) single-shot cine acceleration imaging, and motion-corrected (MOCO), single-shot late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) imaging. Image quality (IQ) of the cine and LGE images was evaluated based on the 5-point Likert scale. The value of fMRI in providing a prognosis in patients with CHD was assessed. Statistical methods included the T test, Mann–Whitney test, Kappa test, Kaplan–Meier curve, Log-rank test, Cox proportional hazard regression analysis, and receiver operating characteristic curves. Results All IQ scores of the short axis CS-cine and both the short and long axes MOCO LGE images were ≥ 3 points. Over a median follow-up of 31 months (range 3.8–38.2), 25 major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) occurred. In the univariate analysis, infarction size (IS), left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), 3D-Global peak longitudinal strain (3D-GPLS), heart failure classification were significantly associated with MACE. When the significantly univariate MACE predictors, added to the multivariate analysis, which showed IS (HR 1.02; 95% CI 1.00–1.05; p = 0.048) and heart failure with preserved EF (HR 0.20; 95% CI 0.04–0.98; p = 0.048) correlated positively with MACE. The optimal cutoff value for LVEF, 3D-GPLS, and IS in predicting MACE was 34.2%, − 5.7%, and 26.1% respectively, with a sensitivity of 90.5%, 64%, and 96.0% and specificity of 72%, 95.2%, and 85.7% respectively. Conclusions The fCMR protocol can be used to make prognostic assessments in patients with CHD and BH limitations by calculating IS and LVEF.

show abstract

Gadobutrol-Enhanced Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Detection of Coronary Artery Disease

Cited by 44 publications

References 46 publications

Kompetenz und Innovation in der kardiovaskulären MRT: Stellungnahme der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Kardiologie – Herz- und Kreislaufforschung

Kompetenz und Innovation in der kardiovaskulären MRT: Stellungnahme der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Kardiologie – Herz- und Kreislaufforschung

Stress perfusion CMR – a report of an initial Romanian experience

Prognosis in patients with coronary heart disease and breath-holding limitations: a free-breathing cardiac magnetic resonance protocol at 3.0 T

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About