2021
DOI: 10.3389/fgene.2021.650821
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

GADTI: Graph Autoencoder Approach for DTI Prediction From Heterogeneous Network

Abstract: Identifying drug–target interaction (DTI) is the basis for drug development. However, the method of using biochemical experiments to discover drug-target interactions has low coverage and high costs. Many computational methods have been developed to predict potential drug-target interactions based on known drug-target interactions, but the accuracy of these methods still needs to be improved. In this article, a graph autoencoder approach for DTI prediction (GADTI) was proposed to discover potential interaction… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, the AUC and AUPR are usually adequate metrics for evaluating the performance of a model for DTI prediction [ 40 ]. Many similar studies have used these two metrics to evaluate the performance of methods for predicting DTIs [ 26 , 28 , 41 43 ]. As biologists often select drug-target pairs with high prediction scores for subsequent wet experiment validation, the recall rates of the top (5%, 10%, 15%, 20%, and 30%) proportion of candidate targets predicted by the model were selected.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Therefore, the AUC and AUPR are usually adequate metrics for evaluating the performance of a model for DTI prediction [ 40 ]. Many similar studies have used these two metrics to evaluate the performance of methods for predicting DTIs [ 26 , 28 , 41 43 ]. As biologists often select drug-target pairs with high prediction scores for subsequent wet experiment validation, the recall rates of the top (5%, 10%, 15%, 20%, and 30%) proportion of candidate targets predicted by the model were selected.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To further evaluate the performance of SDGAE, we compared it with several other state-of-the-art methods, including GRMF [ 8 ], DTINet [ 9 ], GANDTI [ 28 ], NGDTP [ 7 ], MolTrans [ 19 ], and GADTI [ 26 ]. The hyperparameters of these methods were selected based on ranges recommended in the literature.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In the past few decades, many multi-view biological data integration models based on graph learning, matrix decomposition, network fusion, deep learning, nuclear methods and other technologies have been designed and applied to a wide range of bioinformatics topics ( Li et al, 2016 ), such as prediction of drug–target interactions ( Liu et al, 2021 ), identification of cancer driver genes ( Bashashati et al, 2012 ) and genotype-phenotype interactions ( Qin et al, 2020 ). These studies provide meaningful insights into the cause and development of cancer.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Based on L 2,1 norm graph regularization, Cui et al [22] used matrix factorization to predict DTIs. Liu et al [23] used a graph convolutional network (GCN) followed by a random walk with restart (RWR) to obtain features of the drugs and targets from the related heterozygous data, and a matrix factorization model (DistMult) to predict DTIs. Gao et al [24] proposed a collaborative matrix factorization method with soft regularization to predict DTIs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%