1965
DOI: 10.1109/tap.1965.1138542
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Gain optimization for arbitrary antenna arrays

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
28
0

Year Published

1992
1992
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 77 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
1
28
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, we want to optimize the electromagnetic radiation intensity for a particular direction, i.e., the z-direction, at a specific observation point within or near the boundaries of the (2)(3)(4)(5)(6)(7)(8)(9)(10)(11)(12)(13)(14)(15)(16) of Reference [13], since that definition uses an R value corresponding to the far field of the array and assumes all the array elements are located at the origin. In our case, the distance between the observation points and the elements is not in the far field of the array, hence using /?^^p rovides a better mathematical representation of the overall behavior than simply using some nominal R value, such as the distance to the farthest observation point.…”
Section: Contentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…However, we want to optimize the electromagnetic radiation intensity for a particular direction, i.e., the z-direction, at a specific observation point within or near the boundaries of the (2)(3)(4)(5)(6)(7)(8)(9)(10)(11)(12)(13)(14)(15)(16) of Reference [13], since that definition uses an R value corresponding to the far field of the array and assumes all the array elements are located at the origin. In our case, the distance between the observation points and the elements is not in the far field of the array, hence using /?^^p rovides a better mathematical representation of the overall behavior than simply using some nominal R value, such as the distance to the farthest observation point.…”
Section: Contentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(15) Two important points to note are as follows. First, the scaled currents determine the resulting gain at the observation point.…”
Section: Contentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Although the optimum performance of superdirective beamforming is very intriguing, the array uncertainty can make this theoretical performance even worse than that of conventional beamforming. To increase its robustness against array uncertainty, many methods [22][23][24][25][26][27][28] were presented from different perspectives. Most of these methods could be essentially classified as diagonal loading methods, and they have a common defect that how to choose an optimal loading value to calculate weight are not clearly illustrated.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%