2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2009.03.012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

GAIT analysis in patients operated with a novel total ankle prosthesis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
57
0
4

Year Published

2010
2010
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 57 publications
(65 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
4
57
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Similar deterioration of the spatial-temporal parameters and abnormal muscular activation have also been noted more recently [12]. Despite the improved AOFAS scores and function, only 6 months after surgery [13,14], and some restoration of the main gait parameters [15,16], current total ankle arthroplasty does not seem able to re-establish normal joint function fully.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 55%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Similar deterioration of the spatial-temporal parameters and abnormal muscular activation have also been noted more recently [12]. Despite the improved AOFAS scores and function, only 6 months after surgery [13,14], and some restoration of the main gait parameters [15,16], current total ankle arthroplasty does not seem able to re-establish normal joint function fully.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 55%
“…Pre-and post-operative gait data were compared using the Generalized Linear Model (GLM), with the patient as a random effect. Clinical and functional data were also compared to those of a control group [14] consisting of 20 healthy subjects (11 men and 9 women; mean age 27.9 years, range 23-36; mean BMI 21.9, range (18.5-25.0) using the Mann-Whitney test, for not normally distributed or not homoscedastic data, or the one-way ANOVA test otherwise. pValues <0.05 were considered significant.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…To allow recovery of this normal function and good entrapment of the components, nonanatomically shaped articular surfaces of the fixed components and an interposed fully conforming meniscal bearing were designed. Recent additional computer model-based predictions [43], simulator tests [1], measurements on retrievals [2], and gait analysis [27] have provided some evidence of good performance of this prosthesis. Nevertheless, we organized the current multicenter clinical trial to see if improvements occurred with respect to existing devices in (1) flexion at the replaced joint; (2) AOFAS scores; (3) complication rates; and (4) revision rates.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additionally, it has to be determined if theoretical models are based on subjects with a healthy or replaced joint. It is known that loading at the replaced joint is decreased compared to the healthy joint [46][47][48][49]. For axial loading, a 30% load reduction [46] at the replaced joint compared to the healthy joint was therefore assumed.…”
Section: Tibio-talar Loadingmentioning
confidence: 99%