Proceedings of the 17th International Conference on Informatics in Control, Automation and Robotics 2020
DOI: 10.5220/0009791506210628
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Gait-based Person Identification using Multiple Inertial Sensors

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In many research studies, gait parameters are extracted from multiple places, such as the hip, knee and ankle joints, and researchers investigate combining the data collected from the different sites [18] Furthermore, other studies have stated how results could be enhanced by using multiple sensors in gait analysis and gait classification [19,20]. Gao et al have identified the benefits of using multiple sensors with light-weight algorithms as compared with using single wearable sensors with computationally demanding processing to train complex classifiers [21].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In many research studies, gait parameters are extracted from multiple places, such as the hip, knee and ankle joints, and researchers investigate combining the data collected from the different sites [18] Furthermore, other studies have stated how results could be enhanced by using multiple sensors in gait analysis and gait classification [19,20]. Gao et al have identified the benefits of using multiple sensors with light-weight algorithms as compared with using single wearable sensors with computationally demanding processing to train complex classifiers [21].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For person identification, a single sensor on the pelvis [27], [28], foot [19] and ankles [29] have been illustrated. The effect of sensor location on identification performance has been discussed in [30] and more recently in [31], however, the number of subjects used is not enough in both ( 10 and 20 respectively) and they use complete stride for classification instead of a fraction. To the best of the author's knowledge, the comparison of different gait phases in terms of person identification accuracy has not been clearly investigated in the literature.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%