“…Recently, an inertial measurement unit (IMU) system for gait analysis has exhibited validity and reliability in healthy individuals ( Joo, Kim & Park, 2015 ; Kanzler et al, 2015 ; Mariani et al, 2010 ) and patients ( Trojaniello et al, 2014 ; Trojaniello et al, 2015 ; Lee et al, 2018 ); thus, numerous researchers have suggested this alternative approach for gait analysis ( Joo, Kim & Park, 2015 ; Kanzler et al, 2015 ; Mariani et al, 2010 ; Trojaniello et al, 2014 ; Lee et al, 2018 ; Cole et al, 2014 ). Several studies that used the IMU system have reported a significant decline in gait ability based on quantitative speed conditions (e.g., ±20% of the preferred walking speed of an individual), and gait tasks at these speed conditions have been validated in healthy young adults ( Han et al, 2019 ), older adults ( Noh et al, 2020 ; Lee et al, 2020a ), and patients with Parkinson’s disease ( Lee et al, 2020b ). Thus, gait tasks at slower, faster, and self-preferred speeds using the IMU system may demonstrate specific characteristics in young adults, based on a TFMS cut-off score of 14 out of 21.The purpose of this study was to investigate the association between gait ability and fundamental movement patterns in young adults using a TFMS with a cut-off score of 14.…”