2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.robot.2013.08.014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Gait optimization of biped robots based on human motion analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
24
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, monitoring and controlling the ZMP/CoP is fundamental to assure the robot's balance during its walking cycle. Mimicking a human's ZMP trajectory on a bipedal robot has been proven to be a good strategy in order to obtain a more stable and human-like gait cycle compared to a traditional approach (Ferreira et al, 2009a(Ferreira et al, , 2009b(Ferreira et al, , 2010Griffin et al, 2018;Lima et al, 2014;. While a traditional ZMP trajectory tries to maintain it at the center of the foot during the single support phase, a human ZMP/CoP trajectory presents a gradual weight transfer from the heel to the toe during the single support phase (see Figure 1).…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, monitoring and controlling the ZMP/CoP is fundamental to assure the robot's balance during its walking cycle. Mimicking a human's ZMP trajectory on a bipedal robot has been proven to be a good strategy in order to obtain a more stable and human-like gait cycle compared to a traditional approach (Ferreira et al, 2009a(Ferreira et al, , 2009b(Ferreira et al, , 2010Griffin et al, 2018;Lima et al, 2014;. While a traditional ZMP trajectory tries to maintain it at the center of the foot during the single support phase, a human ZMP/CoP trajectory presents a gradual weight transfer from the heel to the toe during the single support phase (see Figure 1).…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, provided that the linearization ofẋ(t) = f (x(t)) + g(x(t))u(t) about ξ opt,i is controllable on [0, T ], the mapping β(·) is invertible. Thus, a Newton method for root finding is applied on the final state constraint equation β(x T ) − x f = 0 in order to find the value of x T such that the solution to (9) is equivalent to the solution to (5). In particular, at the iteration i + 1, we update the value of x T according to the following rule:…”
Section: Enforcing the Final State Constraintmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Typical cost functions are (i) the distance from a desired state-input curve (which does not satisfy the dynamics) and (ii) the energy injected into the system. For example, for humanoid robot design, the distance from a desired (but unfeasible) human-like walking pattern ( [4], [5]) is often considered. Additional challenges arise when the trajectory generation problem is addressed for (underactuated) mechanical systems with impacts.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An unbounded number of applications use the techniques of trajectory generation aiming to speculate, plane and formalize the optimum path especially in robotics applications which are the subject of this research. Important applications in robotics such as the robots that use legs [1][2][3][4], navigation robots [5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12] and robot's manipulators [13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23] are in dire need of using the techniques of optimal trajectory in order to optimize the usage of these applications according to the estimates of peripheral conditions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%