2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.eurger.2014.06.034
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Gait speed and risk assessment for falls among men aged 80 years and older: A prospective cohort study in Taiwan

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
8
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
3
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The extremes of these ranges do not depend on the specific functional test because they follow from assigning the whole part of the population undergoing gait and balance assessment (12.4%) to either the abnormality or non-abnormality branch of the flowchart. Tables S3 and S4 in the Supplementary material provide numerical results on particular cut-offs and for both single fallers and multiple fallers: TUG with cut-offs at 12, 13.5, and 15 s [16], SPPB with cut-offs at 9 and 11 [13], and gait speed with cut-offs at 0.8 and 1 m/s [17]. For these cut-offs the sensitivity with respect to at least one fall ranges from 35.1 to 43.3%, whereas the specificity from 79.0 to 84.3%.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The extremes of these ranges do not depend on the specific functional test because they follow from assigning the whole part of the population undergoing gait and balance assessment (12.4%) to either the abnormality or non-abnormality branch of the flowchart. Tables S3 and S4 in the Supplementary material provide numerical results on particular cut-offs and for both single fallers and multiple fallers: TUG with cut-offs at 12, 13.5, and 15 s [16], SPPB with cut-offs at 9 and 11 [13], and gait speed with cut-offs at 0.8 and 1 m/s [17]. For these cut-offs the sensitivity with respect to at least one fall ranges from 35.1 to 43.3%, whereas the specificity from 79.0 to 84.3%.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Gait speed at an individual’s usual pace has become the “sixth vital sign” or a “functional vital signs,” 44 and it has been identified as a risk factor for disability, cognitive impairment, and falls 20 , 45 . Previous studies have identified that slow gait speed is associated with greater hearing loss and poorer objective physical functioning among older adults 46 , 47 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We also evaluated the results of the 4 m walking speed test and determined its association with a history and risk of falls. This test is simple and feasible to use in primary care settings (Ministry of Health Social Services and Equality, 2014) and the scientific evidence suggest that a lower walking speed could increase the risk of falls (Huijben et al, 2018; Liang et al, 2014). The 4 m walking speed test indicated how long it took for a person to cover that distance walking at a normal, comfortable speed.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Falls are more frequent in women, and the risk of falling has been related to many factors, such as older age, a history of previous falls, fear of falling and gait, and balance impairment (Dokuzlar et al, 2020; Kim et al, 2017; Liang et al, 2014; Tinetti & Kumar, 2010; Veronese et al, 2014). In many cases, falls are caused by a loss of dynamic balance while walking or by a person's inability to maintain their body's center of gravity when they are standing still (Veronese et al, 2014).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%