2022
DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361/202141318
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Galactic gamma-ray and neutrino emission from interacting cosmic-ray nuclei

Abstract: We present a study of the expectations for very-high-energy (VHE) to ultra-high-energy (UHE) gamma-ray and neutrino emission from interacting cosmic rays in our Galaxy as well as a comparison to the latest results for the Galactic UHE diffuse emission. We demonstrate the importance of properly accounting for both the mixed cosmic-ray composition and the gamma-ray absorption. We adopt the wounded-nucleon model of nucleus interactions and provide parameterisations of the resulting gamma-ray and neutrino producti… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 73 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We finally note that in order to safely disentangle different interpretations, having more data will be crucial. In particular, we emphasize the role of neutrino measurements in this context (see also Ahlers et al 2016;Gaggero et al 2015a;Fang & Murase 2021;Breuhaus et al 2022). The truly diffuse component is likely to be entirely hadronic above a few TeV, while the sources that could potentially contribute to the unresolved flux are mostly leptonic (namely, pulsar wind nebulae).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We finally note that in order to safely disentangle different interpretations, having more data will be crucial. In particular, we emphasize the role of neutrino measurements in this context (see also Ahlers et al 2016;Gaggero et al 2015a;Fang & Murase 2021;Breuhaus et al 2022). The truly diffuse component is likely to be entirely hadronic above a few TeV, while the sources that could potentially contribute to the unresolved flux are mostly leptonic (namely, pulsar wind nebulae).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…As an additional comment, we do not account for CR species heavier than helium since, under reasonable conditions, their contribution to the gamma-ray source term is subdominant (less than 10%) with respect to the expected flux due to proton plus helium production rate (see, e.g., Breuhaus et al 2022 for a recent analysis).…”
Section: Injection Parametersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The overall effect of the absorption thus depends on the assumed Galactic distributions of cosmic rays and gas, the ISRF model, and the direction in the sky. The dependence on both the choice of ISRF model and details of the cosmic-ray and gas distributions is however only weak (Vernetto & Lipari 2016;Breuhaus et al 2022), in part because the dominant contribution to the absorption stems from interactions with the homogeneous CMB.…”
Section: Gamma-ray Absorptionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We calculate this following the prescriptions described in Appendix E of Breuhaus et al (2022). We also assume the same ISRF model (Popescu et al 2017) and analytical descriptions of the distributions of Galactic gas (Ferrière 1998;Ferrière et al 2007) and cosmic rays (Lipari & Vernetto 2018) as used there.…”
Section: Gamma-ray Absorptionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It was also discussed how relevant are ultra-high energy gamma-ray measurements (e.g. from Tibet ASγ [28] and future expected ones by LHAASO) as the CR proton spectrum is still not perfectly known in the region of the knee [29,30]. This is due to some discrepancy between KASCADE and IceTop proton knees at about 4 PeV, and to some extent to the discrepancies in the helium knee at about Z × 4 PeV, where Z is the number of protons in the ionized nucleus.…”
Section: The Galactic Plane Fluxesmentioning
confidence: 99%