2021
DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.2112.07659
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Galaxy blending effects in deep imaging cosmic shear probes of cosmology

Erfan Nourbakhsh,
J. Anthony Tyson,
Samuel J. Schmidt
et al.

Abstract: Upcoming deep imaging surveys such as the Vera C. Rubin Observatory Legacy Survey of Space and Time will be confronted with challenges that come with increased depth. One of the leading systematic errors in deep surveys is the blending of objects due to higher surface density in the more crowded images; a considerable fraction of the galaxies which we hope to use for cosmology analyses will overlap each other on the observed sky. In order to investigate these challenges, we emulate blending in a mock catalogue… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…One obvious such area is deblending galaxies with small angular separations. Blending is a major issue in many ground-based surveys; it affects the number counts, photometries, measured shapes, and other parameters (see Dawson et al 2016;Mandelbaum 2018;Melchior et al 2018Melchior et al , 2021Samuroff et al 2018;Nourbakhsh et al 2021 for a review). The inaccuracies due to blending are alarming for many of the next generation of large cosmology surveys where precision measurements of the expansion history of the universe as well as the growth rate of large-scale structure rely heavily on photometric data sets.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One obvious such area is deblending galaxies with small angular separations. Blending is a major issue in many ground-based surveys; it affects the number counts, photometries, measured shapes, and other parameters (see Dawson et al 2016;Mandelbaum 2018;Melchior et al 2018Melchior et al , 2021Samuroff et al 2018;Nourbakhsh et al 2021 for a review). The inaccuracies due to blending are alarming for many of the next generation of large cosmology surveys where precision measurements of the expansion history of the universe as well as the growth rate of large-scale structure rely heavily on photometric data sets.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One obvious such area is deblending galaxies with small angular separations. Blending is a major issue in many ground-based surveys; it affects the number counts, photometries, measured shapes and other parameters (see Dawson et al 2016, Samuroff et al 2018, Mandelbaum 2018, Melchior et al 2018, Nourbakhsh et al 2021, and Melchior et al 2021 for a review). The inaccuracies due to blending are alarming for many of the next generation of large cosmology surveys where precision measurements of the expansion history of the Universe as well as the growth rate of large scale structure, heavily rely on photometric data sets.…”
Section: Network Architecturesmentioning
confidence: 99%