“…Other measurements that have been used to constrain cosmological parameters include, for example, galaxy cluster gas mass fraction as a function of redshift e.g., Allen et al, 2 Samushia & Ratra, 152 Tong et al, 171 Lu et al, 103 Landry et al, 92 galaxy cluster and other large-scale structure properties Mortonson et al, 113 Devi et al, 38 Wang, 180 De Boni et al, 54 Batista et al, 13 and references therein, gamma-ray burst luminosity distance as a function of redshift e.g., Samushia & Ratra, 153 Wang & Dai, 177 Busti et al, 25 Pan et al 116 , HII starburst galaxy apparent magnitude as a function of redshift e.g., Plionis et al, 129,130 Mania & Ratra, 107 , angular size as a function of redshift e.g., Guerra et al, 75 Bonamente et al, 21 Chen & Ratra, 46 , and strong gravitational lensing Chae et al, 37 Lee & Ng, 93 Biesiada et al, 17 Suyu et al, 167 and references therein. 6 While the constraints from these data are typically less restrictive than those derived from the H(z), SNIa, CMB anisotropy, and BAO data, both types of measurements result in largely compatible constraints that generally support a currently accelerating cosmological expansion.…”