2012
DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361/201117944
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Galaxy cluster angular-size data constraints on dark energy

Abstract: We use angular size versus redshift data for galaxy clusters provided by Bonamente and collaborators to place constraints on model parameters of constant and time-evolving dark energy cosmological models. These constraints are compatible with those from other recent data, but are not very restrictive. A joint analysis of the galaxy cluster angular-size data with the more restrictive baryon acoustic oscillation peak length scale and supernova Type Ia apparent-magnitude data, favors a spatially flat cosmological… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
20
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 98 publications
0
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Other measurements that have been used to constrain cosmological parameters include, for example, galaxy cluster gas mass fraction as a function of redshift e.g., Allen et al, 2 Samushia & Ratra, 152 Tong et al, 171 Lu et al, 103 Landry et al, 92 galaxy cluster and other large-scale structure properties Mortonson et al, 113 Devi et al, 38 Wang, 180 De Boni et al, 54 Batista et al, 13 and references therein, gamma-ray burst luminosity distance as a function of redshift e.g., Samushia & Ratra, 153 Wang & Dai, 177 Busti et al, 25 Pan et al 116 , HII starburst galaxy apparent magnitude as a function of redshift e.g., Plionis et al, 129,130 Mania & Ratra, 107 , angular size as a function of redshift e.g., Guerra et al, 75 Bonamente et al, 21 Chen & Ratra, 46 , and strong gravitational lensing Chae et al, 37 Lee & Ng, 93 Biesiada et al, 17 Suyu et al, 167 and references therein. 6 While the constraints from these data are typically less restrictive than those derived from the H(z), SNIa, CMB anisotropy, and BAO data, both types of measurements result in largely compatible constraints that generally support a currently accelerating cosmological expansion.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other measurements that have been used to constrain cosmological parameters include, for example, galaxy cluster gas mass fraction as a function of redshift e.g., Allen et al, 2 Samushia & Ratra, 152 Tong et al, 171 Lu et al, 103 Landry et al, 92 galaxy cluster and other large-scale structure properties Mortonson et al, 113 Devi et al, 38 Wang, 180 De Boni et al, 54 Batista et al, 13 and references therein, gamma-ray burst luminosity distance as a function of redshift e.g., Samushia & Ratra, 153 Wang & Dai, 177 Busti et al, 25 Pan et al 116 , HII starburst galaxy apparent magnitude as a function of redshift e.g., Plionis et al, 129,130 Mania & Ratra, 107 , angular size as a function of redshift e.g., Guerra et al, 75 Bonamente et al, 21 Chen & Ratra, 46 , and strong gravitational lensing Chae et al, 37 Lee & Ng, 93 Biesiada et al, 17 Suyu et al, 167 and references therein. 6 While the constraints from these data are typically less restrictive than those derived from the H(z), SNIa, CMB anisotropy, and BAO data, both types of measurements result in largely compatible constraints that generally support a currently accelerating cosmological expansion.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The observational data that we have studied here still can not distinguish whether dark energy is a time-independent cosmological constant or a time-varying dynamical component. The complementary cosmological probes, such as the strong gravitational lensing and angular diameter distance measurements of galaxy clusters [74], do not yet carry as much statistical weight as the SNe Ia, CMB, BAO and Hubble parameter data. Figure 3.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Also, Chen & Ratra (2012) examined constraints from the angular sizes of galaxy clusters, both for general FRW models and for two classes of flat models with different types of dark energy. Their conclusion is still valid today: such constraints are approximately as restrictive as those based on gammay-ray-burst apparent-luminosity data, strong-gravitational-lensing measurements, or the age of the Universe, but less so than those from BAO or the m-z relation for Type Ia supernovae (or the CMB).…”
Section: Classical Cosmology: Angular Diametersmentioning
confidence: 99%