2021
DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.2111.03077
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Galaxy Formation in the Santa Cruz semi-analytic model compared with IllustrisTNG -- I. Galaxy scaling relations, dispersions, and residuals at z=0

Abstract: We present the first results from applying the Santa Cruz semi-analytic model (SAM) for galaxy formation on merger trees extracted from a dark matter only version of the IllustrisTNG (TNG) simulations. We carry out a statistical comparison between the predictions of the Santa Cruz SAM and TNG for a subset of central galaxy properties at 𝑧 = 0, with a focus on stellar mass, cold and hot gas mass, star formation rate (SFR), and black hole (BH) mass. We find fairly good agreement between the mean predictions of … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

2
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 61 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, for stellar masses and star formation rates, it is known that the residual of these quantities from the mean at a given halo mass is correlated with other halo properties, such as formation history (e.g., Matthee et al 2017), that are known to be correlated with the halo clustering strength via a process called assembly bias (Croton et al 2007). We can think of these as limitations of the standard halo model approach, which could be relatively easily overcome by using SAMs run within merger trees extracted from dissipationless simulations, which we have done in other work (e.g., Gabrielpillai et al 2021;Hadzhiyska et al 2021).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For example, for stellar masses and star formation rates, it is known that the residual of these quantities from the mean at a given halo mass is correlated with other halo properties, such as formation history (e.g., Matthee et al 2017), that are known to be correlated with the halo clustering strength via a process called assembly bias (Croton et al 2007). We can think of these as limitations of the standard halo model approach, which could be relatively easily overcome by using SAMs run within merger trees extracted from dissipationless simulations, which we have done in other work (e.g., Gabrielpillai et al 2021;Hadzhiyska et al 2021).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, it is challenging to connect line emission mechanisms happening on the atomic scale to the sub-parsec-scale molecular clouds, kiloparsec-scale galaxies, and megaparsec-scale dark matter halos. There are many analytic models in the literature describing the major submillimeter LIM targets, including CO, [C II], [O III], and [N II] lines (e.g., Lidz et al 2011;Gong et al 2012;Pullen et al 2013;Kamenetzky et al 2014;Silva et al 2015;Mashian et al 2015;Li et al 2016;Pullen et al 2018;Padmanabhan 2019;Sun et al 2019;Yang & Lidz 2020;Padmanabhan et al 2021). All those models include empirical treatments to some degree and fail to simultaneously cover all the lines of interest.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We also perform additional cross-checks using the concentration obtained by fitting an NFW profile to the halos. In particular, we use c NFW ≡ R vir /R scale (R vir is the virial radius and R scale is the Klypin scale radius (Klypin et al 2011) corresponding to the largest subhalo in the halo) measurements by Gabrielpillai et al (2021), which were obtained by running the Rockstar code (Behroozi et al 2013) on the TNG300 halos.…”
Section: Cluster Data and Propertiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Using the Rockstar catalog of (gravity-only) IllustrisTNG parent halos (Behroozi et al 2013) produced in Gabrielpillai et al (2021), we measure properties of the individual halos, such as the radius R 200 and mass M 200 , where R 200 is the radius at which the mean interior density is 200 times the critical density ρ cr (z) (Battaglia et al 2012), defined as…”
Section: Data Extraction and Modellingmentioning
confidence: 99%