Galaxy-lens determination of H₀: constraining density slope in the context of the mass sheet degeneracy

Abstract

Gravitational lensing offers a competitive method to measure H0 with the goal of 1% precision. A major obstacle comes in the form of lensing degeneracies, such as the mass sheet degeneracy (MSD), which make it possible for a family of density profiles to reproduce the same lensing observables but return different values of H0. The modeling process artificially selects one choice from this family, potentially biasing H0. The effect is more pronounced when the profile of a given lens is not perfectly described by the lens model, which will always be the case to some extent. To explore this, we quantify the bias and spread in H0 by creating quads from two-component mass models and fitting them with a power-law ellipse+shear model. We find that the bias does not correspond to the estimate one would calculate by transforming the profile into a power law near the image radius. We also emulate the effect of including stellar kinematics by performing fits where the slope is constrained to the true value. Informing the fit using the true value near the image radius can introduce substantial bias (0–23% depending on the model). We confirm using Jeans arguments that kinematic constraints can result in a biased value of H0, though the degree of bias depends on the region kinematic modeling probes in specific lenses. We conclude that lensing degeneracies manifest through commonplace modeling approaches in a more complicated way than is assumed in the literature. If stellar kinematics incorrectly break the MSD, their inclusion may introduce more bias than their omission.

Early-Universe-Physics Insensitive and Uncalibrated Cosmic Standards: Constraints on $Ω_{\rm{m}}$ and Implications for the Hubble Tension

“…Reanalyzing data by relaxing strong assumptions is a useful way to check those assumptions. This philosophy has been used to check the validity of other astrophysical assumptions as well, such as in the strong-lensing time-delay technique of determining the Hubble constant [62,91,92]. In the future, galaxy surveys such as the Dark Energy Spectroscopic Instrument (DESI) will provide measurement of BAO with unprecedented precision [93].…”

Prospects of strongly lensed fast radio bursts: simultaneous measurement of post-Newtonian parameter and Hubble constant

“…Methods of breaking MSD have been intensively investigated and could be classified as two catagories, i.e. assuming theoretical priors (Navarro et al 1997;Millon et al 2020;Gomer & Williams 2020;Denzel et al 2021) and appealing non-lensing stellar kinematics data (Birrer et al 2020;). More recently, Ding et al (2021) carried out realistic simulations in lens modeling based on HST WFC3 observations from transient sources (e.g.…”

Testing strong lensing subhalo detection with a cosmological simulation

“…Hsueh et al (2017) showed that the flux ratio anomalies observed in lens system CLASS B0712+472 can be largely resolved by additionally adding a disk profile to the lensing model. The works of Gomer & Williams (2020; Cao et al (2021); Van de Vyvere et al (2021) show that such mismatches can impact on the inference of the Hubble constant via time-delay cosmology.…”