2003
DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-8711.2003.06554.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Galaxy merging, the fundamental plane of elliptical galaxies and the MBH --  0 relation

Abstract: We explore the effects of dissipationless merging on the fundamental plane of elliptical galaxies using an N-body code based on a new, high-performance numerical scheme. We investigate the two extreme cases of galaxy growth by equal-mass merging and accretion of small stellar systems; in a subset of simulations we also consider the presence of dark matter haloes around the merging galaxies. Curiously, we found that the fundamental plane is preserved by major merging, while in the accretion scenario its edge-on… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

34
223
2

Year Published

2006
2006
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 168 publications
(259 citation statements)
references
References 70 publications
34
223
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Tacconi et al (2008) show (in their Fig. 5) that this requires that the SMG masses grow by about an order of magnitude by z ¼ 0, assuming dry mergers with structurally similar systems, following Nipoti et al (2003). We find that of the halos we have identified with the SMGs in x 3.2, %70% remain main branch halos to z ¼ 0 ( Fig.…”
Section: Fate Of Smgsmentioning
confidence: 56%
“…Tacconi et al (2008) show (in their Fig. 5) that this requires that the SMG masses grow by about an order of magnitude by z ¼ 0, assuming dry mergers with structurally similar systems, following Nipoti et al (2003). We find that of the halos we have identified with the SMGs in x 3.2, %70% remain main branch halos to z ¼ 0 ( Fig.…”
Section: Fate Of Smgsmentioning
confidence: 56%
“…Other mechanisms, such as dissipationless mergers of bulge-dominated galaxies ) may be able to better reproduce the elliptical galaxies with the smallest (V/ ) Ã and most negativeā 4 /a parameters. However, this does raise a host of other problems, including reproducing the fundamental plane and M BH -0 relations (e.g., Nipoti et al 2003;Kazantzidis et al 2005), as well as the presence of intermediate-age stellar populations and globular clusters in elliptical galaxies (e.g., Schweizer et al 1990;Whitmore et al 1997Whitmore et al , 2002Rejkuba et al 2001;Thomas et al 2004;Goudfrooij et al 2004;Trager et al 2005). Moreover, with recent deep surveys indicating the presence of a red sequence in color-magnitude diagrams of galaxies as far back as z $ 1 (Hogg et al 2004;Bell et al 2004;McIntosh et al 2005), new questions have been raised concerning the limitations of disk-disk mergers versus other mechanisms, including dissipationless mergers between bulge-dominated galaxies.…”
Section: Summary and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It has been extensively studied, particularly at high redshift where it is the most observationally accessible projection (e.g., Trujillo et al 2006Trujillo et al , 2007Toft et al 2007Toft et al , 2009Zirm et al 2007;Buitrago et al 2008;Cimatti et al 2008;van der Wel et al 2008;Damjanov et al 2009Damjanov et al , 2011Mancini et al 2010;Ryan et al 2010;Saracco et al 2011). The mass-size plane provides some of the most powerful constraints on the merger histories of galaxies (e.g., Nipoti et al 2003), which we exploit in Section 5.…”
Section: Size Evolution Of Massive Galaxiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The growth efficiency is commonly parameterized by α = d log R h /d log M * . For 1 : 1 mergers of spheroids, both the mass and radius approximately double and α 1 (e.g., Hernquist et al 1993;Nipoti et al 2003;Boylan-Kolchin et al 2006).…”
Section: Size Growth Efficiencymentioning
confidence: 99%