1973
DOI: 10.1086/351124
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Galileo's Experimental Confirmation of Horizontal Inertia: Unpublished Manuscripts (Galileo Gleanings XXII)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
7
0
3

Year Published

1978
1978
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 91 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
7
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…For the first This drawing is discussed in the theorem 1 of the fourth day of the two new sciences first published in 1638 [2]. Complementary information can be found in [3]. (Online version in colour.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the first This drawing is discussed in the theorem 1 of the fourth day of the two new sciences first published in 1638 [2]. Complementary information can be found in [3]. (Online version in colour.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Those who have closely examined the data and reproduced the experiment claim a very good fit between calculated and experimental results, but they disagree about what Galileo intended to test: the principle of horizontal inertia (Drake, 1973(Drake, , 1975a, the times-squared law (Naylor, 1974), or the proportionality v: s (Costabel, 1975). For example, in the case of folio 116v, we find evidence of an experiment carried out by dropping an object from different vertical heights (or possibly rolling it down inclined planes of different heights) and then deflected along a horizontal.…”
Section: The Methods Of the Mathematicians: Old Essays And The Begimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…116v. This manuscript was first published by Drake (1973a) and has since been the object of numerous controversies; for a critical review, see Hill 1988. Most interpretations relate the experiment documented by this manuscript not to a technical result of Galileo's theory of projectile motion, as is suggested here, but , , g to more fundamental insights he supposedly achieved by this experiment.…”
Section: The Size Of the Trajectory For Horizontal Projectionmentioning
confidence: 99%