Germanium (Ge) possesses the intriguing properties of the tunability of indirect to direct bandgap by tensile strain and hence the enhancement of optical and electronic performances, which makes tensile-strained Ge very promising for optoelectronic integrated light sources. [1][2][3][4] Theoretically, a minimum 2% biaxial tensile strain is necessary for the indirect-to-direct bandgap conversion, [3,5] which is, unfortunately, much higher than that induced by the typical Ge-Si thermal mismatch of %0.25%. [6,7] While as an alternative high n-type doping was executed to push ahead with the directgap electronic transition by filling the indirect conduction band states, [8] the threshold was inevitably increased and the luminescent performance degraded, [9] and therefore that how to introduce higher tensile strain to Ge become a hot topic.A micromachine was designed to perform a tensile strain of about 2.7% on a Ge nanomembrane, well beyond the critical stain, to demonstrate the concept of the tensile-strain-induced light emission enhancement at room temperature. [10,11] Ge nanostructures embedded in latticemismatch III-V group matrix were another strategy introduced to realize highly tensile-strained Ge. [1,4,12,13] For example, a tensile strain of about 5% is reached in the self-assembled Ge/InAlAs quantum dots grown on InP substrate. [14,15] Different from the growth of Ge on InP and/or InAs that follows the the Volmer-Weber mode without Ge wetting layer, Ge embedded in antimonide obeys the Stranski-Krastanov growth mode and a clear tensile-strained 2D nanolayer exists. [15,16] As a result and owing to not only the large lattice mismatch of about 7.7% but also the presence of tensile-strained Ge nanolayer, GaSb is a preferred candidate as the matrix of highly