2005
DOI: 10.1007/s10709-004-5184-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Gallus gallus aggrecan gene-based phylogenetic analysis of selected avian taxonomic groups

Abstract: Mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) sequences remain the most widely used for phylogenetic analysis in birds. A major limitation of mtDNA sequences, however, is that mitochondria genes are inherited as a single linkage group. Here we describe the use of a 540-bp DNA sequence corresponding to the G3 domain of Gallus gallus nuclear aggrecan gene (AGCI) for phylogenetic analysis of the main groups of Galliformes including Phasianidae, Numididae, and Odontophoridae. We also included species from Cracidae and Megapodiidae wh… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

4
10
1

Year Published

2005
2005
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
4
10
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Discrepancies about the phylogenetic position of G. gallus based on various morphological, behavioral, and molecular methodologies have been noted in previous studies (Bonilla et al, 2010;Bush and Strobeck, 2003;Crowe et al, 2006;Dyke et al, 2003;Kaiser et al, 2007;Kimball and Braun, 2008;Lucchini and Randi, 1999;Shen et al, 2010;Smith et al, 2005). Some studies support the conclusions in this paper that G. gallus should be placed as a basal member of the Phasianidae (Bush and Strobeck, 2003;Kaiser et al, 2007;Kriegs et al, 2007).…”
Section: The Phylogenetic Position Of G Gallussupporting
confidence: 79%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Discrepancies about the phylogenetic position of G. gallus based on various morphological, behavioral, and molecular methodologies have been noted in previous studies (Bonilla et al, 2010;Bush and Strobeck, 2003;Crowe et al, 2006;Dyke et al, 2003;Kaiser et al, 2007;Kimball and Braun, 2008;Lucchini and Randi, 1999;Shen et al, 2010;Smith et al, 2005). Some studies support the conclusions in this paper that G. gallus should be placed as a basal member of the Phasianidae (Bush and Strobeck, 2003;Kaiser et al, 2007;Kriegs et al, 2007).…”
Section: The Phylogenetic Position Of G Gallussupporting
confidence: 79%
“…This group then formed a paraphyletic assemblage of other Phasianidae birds. Nearly all subsequent studies based on nucleotide sequence data from mitochondrial gene regions and nuclear genes (e.g., the CYT B, NADH2, 3′-UTR, Ovomucoid, Aldolase b, and the combined data) support this opinion (Bonilla et al, 2010;Kimball and Braun, 2008;Meng et al, 2010;Shen et al, 2010;Smith et al, 2005). This was also consistent with morphological cladistic analysis (Dyke et al, 2003) and the combined data including morphological and molecular data (Crowe et al, 2006).…”
Section: The Phylogenetic Position Of G Gallussupporting
confidence: 69%
“…Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) primers designed using chicken CR1 were tested on different avian species including guinea fowl and turkey. Consistent with phylogenetic relationships described elsewhere (25), the primers amplified single fragments only in the guinea fowl, but not in the turkey and quail, more distantly related species. For the turkey, multiple fragments were obtained at annealing temperatures ranging from 48 to 60 C.…”
Section: Avian Genomes: Maps and Sequence Comparisonssupporting
confidence: 78%
“…They may also provide a resource for analyzing other avian genomes as well as for evaluating relatedness among birds. Recently, for example, we used Gallus gallus aggrecan to conduct a phylogenetic assessment of relatedness among 48 avian species [25]. The analysis, which supported mitochondria DNA and retroviral evaluations, provides a novel nuclear locus with strong phylogenetic signal.…”
Section: Avian Genomes: Maps and Sequence Comparisonsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The topology corroborates previously published data that place guinea fowl and New World quails, belonging to the families Numididae and Odontophoridae, respectively, outside of the monophyletic Phasianidae. Within the family Phasianidae, the branching pattern is mostly in accordance with those of phylogenetic trees based on mitochondrial sequences, nuclear sequences, or CR1 insertions (29)(30)(31). Our topology does not support the monophyly of the subfamily Phasianinae, because Reeves's pheasant groups with chicken, and ring-necked pheasant groups with turkey.…”
supporting
confidence: 43%