2023
DOI: 10.46298/cm.9298
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Galois cohomology of reductive algebraic groups over the field of real numbers

Abstract: We describe functorially the first Galois cohomology set $H^1({\mathbb R},G)$ of a connected reductive algebraic group $G$ over the field $\mathbb R$ of real numbers in terms of a certain action of the Weyl group on the real points of order dividing 2 of the maximal torus containing a maximal compact torus. This result was announced with a sketch of proof in the author's 1988 note. Here we give a detailed proof.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…\end{equation*}$$Then, DkDk1=0$D^k\circ D^{k-1}=0$. We define the k$k$ ‐th Tate hypercohomology group (see [16, section 3]) Hk(A1A0)badbreak=Zk(A1A0)0.8pt/0.8ptBk(A1A0),$$\begin{equation*} {\mathbb {H}}^k(A_{1}\xrightarrow {\;\; \partial \;\; } A_0)={\rm Z}^k(A_{1}\xrightarrow {\;\; \partial \;\; } A_0)\hspace{0.8pt}/\hspace{0.8pt}{\rm B}^k(A_{1}\xrightarrow {\;\; \partial \;\; } A_0), \end{equation*}$$where normalZkfalse(A10.28em0.28em0.28em0.28emA0false)=kerDk={false(a1,a0false)A1A0,dk+1a1=0,dka0(1)ka1=0},normalBkfalse(A10.28em0.28em0.28em…”
Section: Hypercohomologymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…\end{equation*}$$Then, DkDk1=0$D^k\circ D^{k-1}=0$. We define the k$k$ ‐th Tate hypercohomology group (see [16, section 3]) Hk(A1A0)badbreak=Zk(A1A0)0.8pt/0.8ptBk(A1A0),$$\begin{equation*} {\mathbb {H}}^k(A_{1}\xrightarrow {\;\; \partial \;\; } A_0)={\rm Z}^k(A_{1}\xrightarrow {\;\; \partial \;\; } A_0)\hspace{0.8pt}/\hspace{0.8pt}{\rm B}^k(A_{1}\xrightarrow {\;\; \partial \;\; } A_0), \end{equation*}$$where normalZkfalse(A10.28em0.28em0.28em0.28emA0false)=kerDk={false(a1,a0false)A1A0,dk+1a1=0,dka0(1)ka1=0},normalBkfalse(A10.28em0.28em0.28em…”
Section: Hypercohomologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Consider the right action of N0$N_0$ on Z10.8ptboldT${\rm Z}^1\hspace{0.8pt}{\bf T}$: tngoodbreak=n1·t·γn1emfor0.33emnN0,0.33emtZ10.8ptboldT.$$\begin{equation*} t*n=n^{-1}\cdot t\cdot \hspace{-0.8pt}\hspace{0.8pt}^\gamma \hspace{-0.8pt}n\quad \text{for}\ n\in N_0, \ t\in {\rm Z}^1\hspace{0.8pt}{\bf T}. \end{equation*}$$This action induces a well‐defined right action of W0$W_0$ on H10.8ptboldT${\rm H}^1\hspace{0.8pt}{\bf T}$ (which might not preserve the group structure in H10.8ptboldT${\rm H}^1\hspace{0.8pt}{\bf T}$); see [11, Section 3]. We know that there exists w1=n1·T$w_1=n_1\cdot T$ such that [z]w1=[1]H1boldT$[z]*w_1=[1]\in {\rm H}^1 {\bf T}$; we can find such n1$n_1$ by brute force, by computing H1boldT${\rm H}^1 {\bf T}$, W0$W_0$ and the right action of W0$W_0$ on …”
Section: Normalh1${\rm H}^1$ For Connected Reductive Groups: Equivale...mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…1.3. In the case F = R, the set H 1 (F, G) was computed in [Bor88] (see also [Bor22a]) using the method of Borel and Serre [BS64, Theorem 6.8], and by the first-named author and Timashev in [BT21, Theorem 7.14] using the method of Kac [Kac69]. Note that over F = R, the set H 1 (F, G) cannot be computed in terms of π 1 (G) only.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%