1975
DOI: 10.1016/0022-3999(75)90044-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Galvanic skin potential as a predictor of mental status, anxiety, depression and denial in acute coronary patients

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

1981
1981
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Yet, they are considered to have significant merit in assessing denial because of their relative immunity to faking, social desirability, and conscious manipulation threats. Examples of physiological indices that were employed as indicators of denial include galvanic skin response (GSR), systolic blood pressure reactivity, and heart rate (Froese et al, 1975;Froese et al, 1974;Kneier & Temoshok, 1984;Warrenburg et al, 1989). GSR is regarded as a reliable indicator of anxiety (and psychological distress in general) and, when used in conjunction with polygraphgenerated data, could also seemingly indicate efforts at denial when discrepancies are found between subjective verbal reports of calmness and lack of concern or worry, and more objective physiological signs that suggest heightened distress.…”
Section: Psycho-physiological Measuresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Yet, they are considered to have significant merit in assessing denial because of their relative immunity to faking, social desirability, and conscious manipulation threats. Examples of physiological indices that were employed as indicators of denial include galvanic skin response (GSR), systolic blood pressure reactivity, and heart rate (Froese et al, 1975;Froese et al, 1974;Kneier & Temoshok, 1984;Warrenburg et al, 1989). GSR is regarded as a reliable indicator of anxiety (and psychological distress in general) and, when used in conjunction with polygraphgenerated data, could also seemingly indicate efforts at denial when discrepancies are found between subjective verbal reports of calmness and lack of concern or worry, and more objective physiological signs that suggest heightened distress.…”
Section: Psycho-physiological Measuresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The relationships among denial, anxiety, mental status, and galvanic skin response (GSP) in 25 coronary care unit patients was further studied by Froese, Cassem, Hackett, and Silverberg (1975). Scores on denial were found to be negatively related to ratings of anxiety, but positively related to scores on the Mental Status Exam.…”
Section: Hackett and Cassem: Denialmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition to explicit scales, researchers and practitioners encourage the use of passive techniques to address the imbalance between the demand and supply of mental health resources. For example, many studies have used individual physiological [9,10] and behavioral [11][12][13] indicators as predictors to help identify individuals with mental health problems.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%