1981
DOI: 10.1002/mawe.19810120904
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Galvanostatic formation of barrier‐type Anodic oxides

Abstract: Experimental Factors Affecting Oxide Growth Results of galvanostatic anodization of various metals with varying valve‐metal behaviour including Nb, Ta, Zr, Ti, Al, W, Te, Sb, and Bi are compiled and compared with respect to the effect of various experimental factors such as surface pretreatment, stirring, solution composition, temperature of the bath, on the efficiency of oxide growth relative to that for other anodic processes. It is concluded that all of the above factors play an important role in the anodiz… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
8
0

Year Published

1981
1981
1993
1993

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

4
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
1
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Experience shows that chemical polishing invariably leaves a chemical film on the metal surface, and both the composition of this film and its thickness depend on the chemical used and the duration of the chemical pretreatment [27]. In order to avoid complications that may arise as a result of the occurrence of pre-immersion chemical film, careful mechanical pre-treatment has been found to lead to fairly reproducible results, and this procedure has therefore been preferred in many studies on valve metals [25]. The mechanical pre-treatment adopted in the present work involved polishing with metallurgical papers of various grades, with intermittent washing with conductivity water and drying with filter paper between each two successive grades.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Experience shows that chemical polishing invariably leaves a chemical film on the metal surface, and both the composition of this film and its thickness depend on the chemical used and the duration of the chemical pretreatment [27]. In order to avoid complications that may arise as a result of the occurrence of pre-immersion chemical film, careful mechanical pre-treatment has been found to lead to fairly reproducible results, and this procedure has therefore been preferred in many studies on valve metals [25]. The mechanical pre-treatment adopted in the present work involved polishing with metallurgical papers of various grades, with intermittent washing with conductivity water and drying with filter paper between each two successive grades.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The test Sn anode was placed outside the cathode holder, and its surface was made to approach as far as possible the tip of the Luggin capillary. Since C1-jons were found to hinder the oxide growth on a number of valve metals [25], and because of the fear that this may also happen with Sn particularly in phosphate solutions, precautions were made to minimize the diffusion of C1-ions from the sat calomel halfcell into the electrolytic cell. This was achieved by joining the Luggin capillary to a long salt bridge carrying a tap and containing the same solution under investigation.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The electrode surface was mechanically polished using metallurgical papers of various grades, washed with distilled water, and was finally rubbed with tissue paper for sufficient time until the surface became bright and smooth [31]. The open-circuit potential was measured using an x-y recorder.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It appears from the literature that among the primary factors which affect the nature of the passivating films formed on Sn are the nature, composition, and pH of the solution [31]. In order to gain more information on the passive behaviour of Sn in neutral solutions, the present study has been undertaken in order to report the results of open circuit potential, and those of cyclic galvanostatic polarization in solutions which (i) produce thin transparent passive films (eg phosphate buffer), and (ii) those which produce thick anodic films (chloride, and sulphate), and compare the results in both cases.…”
Section: )mentioning
confidence: 99%