2021
DOI: 10.1007/s10899-021-10019-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Gambling Interventions in Indigenous Communities, from Theory to Practice: A Rapid Qualitative Review of the Literature

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 61 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…(50) The limited data available suggests that gambling adversely affects up to 20% of Aboriginal peoples compared to 3.2% of non-Indigenous Australians. (50,51) With increasing concerns about the normalisation of gambling and the pervasive nature of gambling marketing in Australia, the ndings of this study reinforce the need for stronger regulatory controls on the marketing of gambling in Australia and more rigorous monitoring of gambling prevalence and harms, including among Aboriginal peoples. (48,52) The exploitation of Indigenous Cultural and Intellectual Property (ICIP) and the associated harms to cultural wellbeing was a unique commercial determinant of health identi ed by participants in our study.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(50) The limited data available suggests that gambling adversely affects up to 20% of Aboriginal peoples compared to 3.2% of non-Indigenous Australians. (50,51) With increasing concerns about the normalisation of gambling and the pervasive nature of gambling marketing in Australia, the ndings of this study reinforce the need for stronger regulatory controls on the marketing of gambling in Australia and more rigorous monitoring of gambling prevalence and harms, including among Aboriginal peoples. (48,52) The exploitation of Indigenous Cultural and Intellectual Property (ICIP) and the associated harms to cultural wellbeing was a unique commercial determinant of health identi ed by participants in our study.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Whiteside et al, (2020) conducted a systematic review of interventions in Indigenous gambling identifying four articles, only one of which provided (indeterminant) outcomes data. This is supported by Saunders et al, (2021) who also identified a dearth of empirical evidence to inform the design of policy and interventions for Indigenous populations.…”
Section: Indigenous Peoplesmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Two articles referred to harm reduction programs specific to Indigenous peoples [ 82 , 83 ]. Whiteside et al, (2020) conducted a systematic review of interventions in Indigenous gambling identifying four articles, only one of which provided (indeterminant) outcomes data.…”
Section: Q2 What Evidence Is There Of Impact Of Gambling-related Harm...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In that era gambling studies also encompassed anthropological and archaeological studies more generally (e.g., Gabriel, 1996). More recent research on Indigenous gambling is situated within a harm reduction approach (Hilbrecht et al, 2020) or problem gambling approach (Williams et al, 2021;Saunders & Doyle, 2021). Within a critical Indigenous studies framework, then, gambling studies can be understood as a microcosm of the academic gaze on Indigenous peoples as described by Hokowhitu (2020) and Moreton-Robinson (2016).…”
Section: The Problem Of Representation In Indigenous Gambling Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%