“…Social science literature, however, especially those studies produced within the disciplinary interests of “martial arts and combat sports (MACS)” (e.g., Farrer and Whalen-Bridge, 2011 ; Sánchez-García and Spencer, 2013 ; Channon and Jennings, 2014 ), and “martial arts studies” (Bowman, 2014 , 2015 , 2017 , 2018 ), have so far contributed to provide a picture of martial arts as first and foremost a fearsome activity dominated by action, physical confrontation and violence. This literature has extensively inquired into the history, developments and deployments of many martial arts (e.g., Green and Svinth, 2003 ) and their deconstruction (e.g., Bowman, 2019a ), focusing especially on their “culture of combats” (e.g., Sánchez-García and Spencer, 2013 ; Brown et al, 2019 ), pedagogical environments, processes of apprenticeship, and knowledge transmission (e.g., Wacquant, 2004 ; Brown, 2005 , 2011 ; Downey, 2005 , 2008 ; Spencer, 2009 , 2014 ; Brown and Jennings, 2011 ; Downey et al, 2015 ; Jennings et al, 2020 ), embodiment and sensuous involvement (e.g., Stephens and Delamont, 2006 ; Samudra, 2008 ; Farrer and Whalen-Bridge, 2011 ; Spencer, 2011 , 2012 ; Jennings, 2013 ; Channon and Jennings, 2014 ; Southwood and Delamont, 2018 ; Telles et al, 2018 ), religious and spiritual bearings (e.g., Maliszewski, 1996 ; Brown et al, 2009 , 2014 ; Jennings et al, 2010 ; Brown, 2013 ; Tuckett, 2016 ; Pedrini, 2020 ), and media representations (e.g., Brown et al, 2008 ; Jakubowska et al, 2016 ; Yip, 2017 ; Bowman, 2019b , c , d , 2020a , b ; Trausch, 2019 ). Moreover, as this body of work increases, specializes and further develops, also its attention to conceptual clarity and theoretical developments intensifies, with the consequent introduction of a host of new concepts and theoretical perspectives (e.g., Brown and Jennings,…”