“Game playing” and “docility”: youth justice in question

Abstract

<jats:sec> <jats:title content-type="abstract-subheading">Purpose</jats:title> <jats:p>The purpose of this paper is to explore young people's experiences of youth justice supervision with particular reference to the efficacy of participatory practices. This paper is based on findings from a study concerning the extent and nature of children’s participation in decision-making in youth justice. The paper uses Bourdieu’s concept of habitus, as a heuristic/practical device, to investigate children’s ability to express agency and shape or influence the content and format of interventions and approaches in youth justice.</jats:p> </jats:sec> <jats:sec> <jats:title content-type="abstract-subheading">Design/methodology/approach</jats:title> <jats:p>The researcher’s interest in understanding the perceptions and experiences of youth justice supervision led to the adoption of the qualitative approach and specifically in-depth interviews and participant observations. The researcher interviewed front-line professionals (n = 14), operational managers (n = 6) and children under youth justice supervision (n = 20). This study involved 15 months of fieldwork undertaken between 2016 and 2017 at a youth offending service in England.</jats:p> </jats:sec> <jats:sec> <jats:title content-type="abstract-subheading">Findings</jats:title> <jats:p>Several young people were seeking to exert minimal energy to achieve a type of passive compliance with court order requirements, adopting a “ready-to-conform” mindset. Professionals were concerned that they were also participating in this type of “game playing”.</jats:p> </jats:sec> <jats:sec> <jats:title content-type="abstract-subheading">Practical implications</jats:title> <jats:p>A relationship-based practice that is conducive to meaningful participation can help to facilitate positive changes to lifestyles and circumstances. This paper exposes its pivotal role in bolstering children’s involvement in supervision, reducing passive compliance and preventing inauthentic transactional arrangements from forming.</jats:p> </jats:sec> <jats:sec> <jats:title content-type="abstract-subheading">Originality/value</jats:title> <jats:p>In spite of the significant interest in the work of Pierre Bourdieu, his “thinking tools” have seldom been used to investigate the experiences, attitudes and behaviours of youth justice professionals and those under youth offending team supervision at.</jats:p> </jats:sec>

Co‐creating youth justice practice with young people: Tackling power dynamics and enabling transformative action

“…Their status as 'young offenders' results in a lack of equity of access to participate (see Byrne & Lundy, 2019). It is generally accepted that there is a lack of research in the area of young people's participation in youth justice systems (see Creaney, 2020).…”

Building Cultures of Participation: Involving Young People in Contact with the Criminal Justice System in the Development of Drug Interventions in the United Kingdom, Denmark, Italy and Poland

“…As Creaney (2020) found in his research, practitioners experience managerial pressures to get young people through their orders. This was particularly evident when speaking with practitioners working through the Youth Offending Services (YOS) in the United Kingdom.…”

Lessons Learned in Meaningful Collaboration With Justice Involved Young Adults

“…In summary, it was often difficult to "find our place" in coproduction/ participatory literature. Horner (2016) observes the extent to which the sphere has grown, yet the paucity of literature on justice-involved young adults' access to participation is glaring (Creaney, 2020). Looking back, we initially struggled and felt a huge responsibility to all participants.…”