2005
DOI: 10.1002/aic.10635
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Game theoretic approach to multiobjective designs: Focus on inherent safety

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…R EMARK 3 . Based on the phase behavior (minimum‐phase behavior and nonminimum‐phase behavior), the controllability analysis for a single unit is discussed in previous work 27, 59…”
Section: Methodology Developmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…R EMARK 3 . Based on the phase behavior (minimum‐phase behavior and nonminimum‐phase behavior), the controllability analysis for a single unit is discussed in previous work 27, 59…”
Section: Methodology Developmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Existing research also has shown that a control structure that fixes the flow rate of one stream somewhere in a liquid recycle loop can prevent the snowball 57. Extended bifurcation diagrams59 can facilitate changes to the process network design, to ameliorate some of the instability and poor controllability introduced by large recycle streams and/or heat integration schemes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Morari et al 19 RHP Zeros LD Russell and Perkins 20 Time delay NLD Skogestad and Morari 21,22 CN LD Bogle and Rashid 23 CN LD Psarris and Floudas 24,25 Time delay LD Narraway and Perkins 26 Economic back-off LD Skogestad and Hovd 27 RGA, CLDG LD Weitz and Lewin 28 Disturbance cost LD Soroush 29 Time delay LD Zafiriou E, Chiou 30 Process zeros LD Cao and Perkins 31 Output deviation NLD Lewin and Bogle 32 RGA LD Young and Swart 33 Economic back-off LD Ross and Swartz 34 Closed-loop performance LD Havre and Skogestad 35 NMP performance NLD Gal and Varga 36 Structural controllability LD Chenery and Walsh 37 Output deviation LD Zheng and Mahajanam 38 Dynamic controllability LD Kim and Yoon 39 Structural controllability NLD Byungwoo et al 40 Structural controllability NLD Kuhlman and Bogle 41 NMP performance NLD Karafyllis and Kokossis 42 Disturbance resiliency NLD Meeuse and Tousain 43 Closed-loop performance LD Maya-Yescas and Aguilar 44 RGA NLD Kuhlman and Bogle 45 NMP performance NLD Cao and Yang 46 Singular value, zeros LD Engell et al 47 RPN LD Meel and Seider 48 NMP performance NLD Santoso et al 49 Passivity NLD Srinivasan and Bonvin 50 Output controllability NLD Kaymak and Luyben 51 Dynamic controllability NLD Santoso et al 52 Passivity LD Papadopoulos and Seferlis 53 Sensitivity analysis NLD Kaistha et al 54 Closed-loop performance NLD increasing proximity of the zeros to the imaginary axis. Studies 58 have shown that RHP zeroes cannot be shifted to different locations by ou...…”
Section: Cn Ldmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Meel and Seider presented a game theory-based multiobjective optimization method for designing processes, focusing on inherent safety. 48 This multiobjective optimization of design considering controllability, flexibility, and stability simultaneously would be a very interesting future development.…”
Section: Multiobjective Optimization-based Analysis For Chemical Procmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Kuhlmann and Bogle 24 demonstrated the relationships between input multiplicity and nonminimum phase behavior and between controllability and optimal operation for nonlinear single-input, single-output systems, and they 25 also shown the process inherent limitation on switchability imposed by unstable zero dynamics. Meel and Seider 26 introduced a method for designing the inherently safer processes with good controllability according to the zero dynamics. Yuan et al 27 presented a methodology for segregating the whole operating space of a CSTR into subspaces with different characteristics based on instability/stability and nonminimum/minimum phase behavior.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%