2017
DOI: 10.1109/jsac.2017.2659338
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Game-Theoretic Multi-Agent Control and Network Cost Allocation Under Communication Constraints

Abstract: Multi-agent networked linear dynamic systems have attracted attention of researchers in power systems, intelligent transportation, and industrial automation. The agents might cooperatively optimize a global performance objective, resulting in social optimization, or try to satisfy their own selfish objectives using a noncooperative differential game. However, in these solutions, large volumes of data must be sent from system states to possibly distant control inputs, thus resulting in high cost of the underlyi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
39
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 60 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
39
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus, under this circumstance, a non-cooperative game model based on the distributed energy system for coordinated operation in the MGC is presented in [53,54], the optimal balanced state of each agent can be achieved. Moreover, the non-cooperative game model cannot be applied to the large-scale computing and simulation analysis scenario for the dynamic game process of the MGC.…”
Section: A Modeling Methods For Distributed Multi-agent Systemmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Thus, under this circumstance, a non-cooperative game model based on the distributed energy system for coordinated operation in the MGC is presented in [53,54], the optimal balanced state of each agent can be achieved. Moreover, the non-cooperative game model cannot be applied to the large-scale computing and simulation analysis scenario for the dynamic game process of the MGC.…”
Section: A Modeling Methods For Distributed Multi-agent Systemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Graph theoretic topology model [45][46][47][48][49][50][51] ·Simple model structure ·High redundancy and easy to expand ·Robustness is greatly affected by graph Non-cooperative dynamic game model [52][53][54] ·Each agent can achieve the optimal balanced state ·Algorithm is complex and time-consuming Genetic algorithm [55][56][57] ·High prediction accuracy ·Fast convergence ·Scalability and parallelism operation ·Most of the parameters depend on experience ·Slow dynamic response PSO algorithm [58][59][60][61] ·Simple model structure ·Fast computation speed ·Efficient economic scheduling ·Improve the frequency and voltage of MG ·Not handling the discrete optimization problems…”
Section: Merits Drawbacksmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In [20], [21] the authors use cost allocation based on standalone cost principle and cost causation principle respectively. A different, but related, line of work is that in [22], [23] that develops a distributed algorithm based on the Nash Bargaining Solution to fairly allocate the costs of the communication infrastructure in [22] and power management in [23] among the agents. However, to the best of our knowledge, the literature on cost allocation assumes the agents to be not cost anticipatory, in the sense that they do not optimize the decision that they take with respect to both their a priori utility function and the cost that will be allocated to them.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Using power line measurement, a control policy was developed in [11] to withstand any single communication link failure. The role of communication network topology on power grid control has been studied in [12], [13].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%