2019
DOI: 10.1038/s41467-019-13148-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Game theoretical inference of human behavior in social networks

Abstract: Social networks emerge as a result of actors’ linking decisions. We propose a game-theoretical model of socio-strategic network formation on directed weighted graphs, in which every actors’ benefit is a parametric trade-off between centrality measure, brokerage opportunities, clustering coefficient, and sociological network patterns. We use two different stability definitions to infer individual behavior of homogeneous, rational agents from network structure, and to quantify the impact of cooperation. Our theo… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

3
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
(62 reference statements)
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, except for the fitness model 16 in which users are connected with probability proportional to the individuals’ fitness attributes, the large multidisciplinary interest in the study of network formation has so far privileged topological and socio-economic aspects observed in offline social networks (or in online social networks which mimic them, e.g., Facebook) and neglected the effect of the UGC. For example, Stochastic Actor-Oriented Models 17 , in sociology, and strategic network formation models 18 , in economics, assume actors decide their ties according to a utilitarian principle based on sociological elements, such as reciprocity or network closure 19 , or topological measures, e.g., in-degree or closeness centrality 20 , or a combination of them 21 . These models typically lead to networks characterized by bilateral social connections and high transitivity.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, except for the fitness model 16 in which users are connected with probability proportional to the individuals’ fitness attributes, the large multidisciplinary interest in the study of network formation has so far privileged topological and socio-economic aspects observed in offline social networks (or in online social networks which mimic them, e.g., Facebook) and neglected the effect of the UGC. For example, Stochastic Actor-Oriented Models 17 , in sociology, and strategic network formation models 18 , in economics, assume actors decide their ties according to a utilitarian principle based on sociological elements, such as reciprocity or network closure 19 , or topological measures, e.g., in-degree or closeness centrality 20 , or a combination of them 21 . These models typically lead to networks characterized by bilateral social connections and high transitivity.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Just imagine, however computer science can be separated from mathematics when doing computing. How computer science disproves mathematics when the program flow requires logic (Graham, Knuth, Patashnik, & Liu, 1989), especially when optimization must play a role or the intelligence is implanted to overcome human behaviour (Delle Monache, 2016;Gillen, Freeman, & Tootell, 2017;Nasution, 2018g;Pagan & Dörfler, 2019;Hosni, Li, & Ahmad, 2020). Not only is the study of program complexity at the core of computer science (McCabe, 1976), but the efficient use of energy is the accompaniment of program implementation (Mayer & Dänekas, 2013;Karanikolas & Liaramantzas, 2017).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Bertrand-Nash competition (Narahari et al, 2009), computational social science, e.g. social networks formation (Pagan & Dörfler, 2019), biology, e.g. swarms of birds (Molloy et al, 2018), automatic control, e.g.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%