Gaming My Way to Recovery: A Systematic Scoping Review of Digital Game Interventions for Young People's Mental Health Treatment and Promotion

Abstract

Nearly all young people use the internet daily. Many youth with mental health concerns, especially since the Covid-19 pandemic, are using this route to seek help, whether through digital mental health treatment, illness prevention tools, or supports for mental wellbeing. Videogames also have wide appeal among young people, including those who receive mental health services. This review identifies the literature on videogame interventions for young people, ages 12-29, and maps the data on game use by those with mental health and substance use problems, focusing on evidence for the capacity of games to support treatment in youth mental health services; how stakeholders are involved in developing or evaluating games; and any potential harms and ethical remedies identified. A systematic scoping review methodology was used to identify and assess relevant studies. A search of multiple databases identified a total of 8,733 articles. They were screened, and 49 studies testing 32 digital games retained. An adapted stepped care model, including four levels, or steps, based on illness manifestation and severity, was used as a conceptual framework for organizing target populations, mental health conditions and corresponding digital games, and study results. The 49 selected studies included: 10 studies (20.4%) on mental health promotion/prevention or education for undiagnosed youth (Step 0: 7 games); 6 studies (12.2%) on at-risk groups or suspected mental problems (Step 1: 5 games); 24 studies (49.0%) on mild to moderate mental conditions (Steps 2-3: 16 games); and 9 studies (18.4%) focused on severe and complex mental conditions (Step 4: 7 games). Two interventions were played by youth at more than one level of illness severity: the SPARX game (Steps 1, 2-3, 4) and Dojo (Steps 2-3 and 4), bringing the total game count to 35 with these repetitions. Findings support the potential integration of digital games in youth services based on study outcomes, user satisfaction, relatively high program retention rates and the potential usefulness of most games for mental health treatment or promotion/prevention. Most studies included stakeholder feedback, and involvement ratings were very high for seven games. Potential harms were not addressed in this body of research. This review provides an important initial repository and evaluation of videogames for use in clinical settings concerned with youth mental health.

Association of game use with Loneliness and Social Isolation: a nationwide Korean study

“…Third, our results show that online gaming is associated with protection from loneliness and social isolation. This can be a meaningful nding among the social discourse with regard to the effects of online gaming [32,33]. The ndings of this investigation are consistent with recent research which suggests that use of virtual reality can positively affect emotion, and that interpersonal connections can be reinforced online [34].…”

Trajectories of Adolescent Media Use and Their Associations With Psychotic Experiences

“…46,47 Given the greater uptake of video games among adolescents who eventually develop PEs, as the results suggest, it is worth-while to consider whether leveraging video games as therapeutic tools can increase the reach and accessibility of early intervention services. 48…”

Practical psychiatry: Taking gaming seriously – a primer for psychiatrists on gamers and gaming culture

“…Australasian Psychiatry 32 (1) youth in at-risk, to mild, and moderate mental ill-health categories. 14 This is in addition to interest regarding 'Serious games' that apply the positive properties of games to provide therapy and support to patients. 15 There is also evidence that commercial videogames are therapeutic for people with diverse challenges, including increasing social connectedness in young men with Duchenne muscular dystrophy, 16 and are associated with improved physical condition, neurocognition, social functioning, self-efficacy and quality of life in people with schizophrenia.…”