1998
DOI: 10.2307/1409030
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Gaming: The Apex of a Long Struggle

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 1 publication
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Third, and most importantly, First Nations leaders adopted the American Indian position that operating casinos was a sovereign right (Belanger 2006, 2012; Lazarus et al 2006). American Indian and First Nations gaming is therefore heralded as a beacon of Indian sovereignty (Stein 1998; Gaughen 2011; Hansen and Skopek 2011), whereas Congressional demands for state‐American Indian compacts are criticized as an intolerable imposition compromising American Indians’ inherent sovereignty (Mezey 1996; Light and Rand 2005; Ackerman 2009; Schaap 2010; Skopek and Hansen 2011). Perhaps as troubling is the fact that gaming tribes have little to no recourse in instances where states desire to renegotiate the compacts (Light and Rand 2005; Rand 2007; Rausch 2007); or when the provinces refuse First Nations a substantial consultative role during gaming policy development (Belanger and Williams 2012).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Third, and most importantly, First Nations leaders adopted the American Indian position that operating casinos was a sovereign right (Belanger 2006, 2012; Lazarus et al 2006). American Indian and First Nations gaming is therefore heralded as a beacon of Indian sovereignty (Stein 1998; Gaughen 2011; Hansen and Skopek 2011), whereas Congressional demands for state‐American Indian compacts are criticized as an intolerable imposition compromising American Indians’ inherent sovereignty (Mezey 1996; Light and Rand 2005; Ackerman 2009; Schaap 2010; Skopek and Hansen 2011). Perhaps as troubling is the fact that gaming tribes have little to no recourse in instances where states desire to renegotiate the compacts (Light and Rand 2005; Rand 2007; Rausch 2007); or when the provinces refuse First Nations a substantial consultative role during gaming policy development (Belanger and Williams 2012).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%