2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2019.05.031
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Gamma-glutamyltransferase as a preoperative differential diagnostic marker in patients with adnexal mass

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Additionally, in other already available predicting scores, the combination of parameters improved the discrimination of adnexal masses [30,31]. Compared to a variety of biomarker studies [12][13][14]32], these new models are applicable in a routine setting, as only routinely available parameters were included in the model building process. Besides classic laboratory parameters, patient age was included as a clinical parameter as to be found also in other classifiers such as the Copenhagen index (CA125, HE-4, and age) [31].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Additionally, in other already available predicting scores, the combination of parameters improved the discrimination of adnexal masses [30,31]. Compared to a variety of biomarker studies [12][13][14]32], these new models are applicable in a routine setting, as only routinely available parameters were included in the model building process. Besides classic laboratory parameters, patient age was included as a clinical parameter as to be found also in other classifiers such as the Copenhagen index (CA125, HE-4, and age) [31].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the search for other predictive serum markers, preoperative hypoalbuminemia was described as a prognostic parameter in ovarian cancer [9] and other gynecologic malignancies [10,11]. Likewise, C-reactive protein (CRP), gamma glutamyl transferase (GGT), and lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) were identified to be promising in the differential diagnosis of adnexal masses [12][13][14], whereby CRP seems to have a stronger predictive potential with a sensitivity and specificity of 80.1% and 90.8%, respectively, in combination with CA125, whereas GGT showed a sensitivity and specificity of 54.5% and 83.8%. A variety of biomarker panels has been proposed, but none have been comprehensively used in clinical routine thus far.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%