2003
DOI: 10.1007/s00222-002-0272-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Gamma homology, Lie representations and E ? multiplications

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
72
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(73 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
1
72
0
Order By: Relevance
“…If this was all we really wanted, the result is essentially due to Baker [6] in its A ∞ form, or one could follow Robinson [36] for the E ∞ case. 12 But Hopkins and Miller did much more.…”
Section: Hopkins-miller Solves a Moduli Problemmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…If this was all we really wanted, the result is essentially due to Baker [6] in its A ∞ form, or one could follow Robinson [36] for the E ∞ case. 12 But Hopkins and Miller did much more.…”
Section: Hopkins-miller Solves a Moduli Problemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is this case for which Robinson's original obstruction theory (see [35] and [6]) applied, at least in the A ∞ case. More recently ( [36]) Robinson has an E ∞ version based on Gamma cohomology [37]. For 2.)…”
Section: Problem 21 (Realization Problem Iibis)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Alan Robinson then identifies E .Q m nC1 Ë † m E^m/ as some tractable algebraic object and induces homomorphism up to E E . Furthermore he proves in [24,Proposition 5.4] that obstruction are always cocycles for a suitable coboundary map, which then gives the final identification with Gamma cohomology groups.…”
Section: Where the Obstructions Come Frommentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Alan Robinson introduced this filtration in [24] and we will describe it in Section 3. We will prove Theorem 1.1 in Section 6.2.…”
Section: Theorem 11mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In [17], Robinson makes explicit a small complex, analogous to Harrison's complex, which computes usual -homology. In the case where the operad P is Koszul, we define an explicit complex to compute the -homology associated to P. Recall that an operad is Koszul if we have a quasi-isomorphism between .P ı KP ı P; @/ and P, where KP is the Koszul construction, defined by K.P/ .s/ WD H s .B .P/ .s/ ; @/.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%