1975
DOI: 10.1080/00337577508237425
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Gamma-radiation damage effects on plastic scintillators

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

4
2
0

Year Published

1989
1989
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
4
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The damage also appears to be correlated with exposure dose following a logarithmic trend, consistent with Oldham and Ware [11] and Buss et al [12]. In other words, most of the damage occurs early in the exposure, for example PET was damaged 65% in the first 1 MRad of exposure, but increased only 23% further after another 9 MRad.…”
Section: Measurement Resultssupporting
confidence: 79%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The damage also appears to be correlated with exposure dose following a logarithmic trend, consistent with Oldham and Ware [11] and Buss et al [12]. In other words, most of the damage occurs early in the exposure, for example PET was damaged 65% in the first 1 MRad of exposure, but increased only 23% further after another 9 MRad.…”
Section: Measurement Resultssupporting
confidence: 79%
“…These plots show that while PEN handles a high radiation environment better than PET, PET has a remarkable ability to recover. PET, however, takes a considerable amount of time to recover.The damage also appears to be correlated with exposure dose following a logarithmic trend, consistent with Oldham and Ware[11] and Buss et al[12]. In other words, most of the damage occurs early in the exposure, for example PET was damaged 65% in the first 1 MRad of exposure, but increased only 23% further after another 9 MRad.…”
supporting
confidence: 81%
“…For doses below 1 megarad, very little damage is observed. However for doses above 1 megarad, the damage follows an exponential law as observed in a previous experiment [3]. The recovery data in figures l(c) & (d) display a similar form, but the amplitudes are significantly different.…”
Section: Methodssupporting
confidence: 78%
“…We carried out the same UV irradiation in vacuum and air for PS nanospheres and found a decrease in the 350 nm PL peak intensity with the generation of several PL peaks in the visible range. That means the decrease of the 350 nm PL peak intensity should be related to the creation of new luminophores, which are formed by photochemical reactions 19 . Correlation between the decrease of the 350 nm PL peak and generation of new luminophores is described by the following equation: where A and B are constants, y is the yield of luminescence, and t is the irradiation time.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%