1995
DOI: 10.1086/309603
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Gamma-Ray Burst Peak Duration as a Function of Energy

Abstract: Gamma-ray burst time histories often consist of many peaks. These peaks tend to be narrower at higher energy. If gamma-ray bursts are cosmological, the energy dependence of gamma-ray burst time scales must be understood in order to correct the time scale dependence due to the expansion of the universe. By using the average autocorrelation function and the average pulse width, we show that the narrowing with energy follows, quite well, a power law. The power law index is about -0.4. This is the first quantitati… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

64
217
5

Year Published

2003
2003
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 230 publications
(286 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
64
217
5
Order By: Relevance
“…It shows that there is no significant time dilation of the faint GRBs. We note here that because the widths of the peaks in the time histories of GRBs -and the durations of GRBsare shorter at higher energies (e.g., Fenimore et al 1995 ), this partly (but only partly) compensates for the time dilation due to the cosmological redshift. GRB durations go approximately like E −0.4 , so that this effect shortens the observed durations of GRBs at a redshift z = 10 relative to the durations of GRBs at a redshift z = 1 by a factor of about [(1+10)/(1+1)] 0.4 = 2.…”
Section: X-ray Rich Grbs and The Hardness-intensity Correlationmentioning
confidence: 78%
“…It shows that there is no significant time dilation of the faint GRBs. We note here that because the widths of the peaks in the time histories of GRBs -and the durations of GRBsare shorter at higher energies (e.g., Fenimore et al 1995 ), this partly (but only partly) compensates for the time dilation due to the cosmological redshift. GRB durations go approximately like E −0.4 , so that this effect shortens the observed durations of GRBs at a redshift z = 10 relative to the durations of GRBs at a redshift z = 1 by a factor of about [(1+10)/(1+1)] 0.4 = 2.…”
Section: X-ray Rich Grbs and The Hardness-intensity Correlationmentioning
confidence: 78%
“…For this subset we could study the analogous relation in the GRB source rest frame. The corresponding intrinsic quantities, denoted with subscript i, were calculated as follows: τ i = τ/(1 + z) 0.6 , which combines the cosmological dilation and the narrowing of pulses with energy as modelled by Fenimore et al (1995); T 90,i = T 90 /(1 + z). In the latter case we did not apply the narrowing of pulses to the overall duration of the burst: this is correct especially in the presence of waiting times.…”
Section: Dominant Timescale Vs Durationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We have an assumed functional form for g(z) with one unknown constant c . This constant can be calculated using the dependence of on energy bands (Fenimore et al 1995). These equations can be evaluated for the sensitivity of calculated quantities such as z and L B on observables such as P ph and hEi (which in turn depends on the spectral parameters).…”
Section: Calculatinggredshiftsmentioning
confidence: 99%